Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36281767›Full record

Trial reportBrain : a journal of neurology2022

Precuneus magnetic stimulation for Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Giacomo Koch, Elias Paolo Casula, Sonia Bonnì, Ilaria Borghi, Martina Assogna, Marilena Minei, Maria Concetta Pellicciari, Caterina Motta, Alessia D'Acunto, Francesco Porrazzini and 6 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 141 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06379100 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study on Cerebellar ITBS Mode Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorXijing HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation, Alzheimer Disease, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ElectroencephalogramArmstranscranial magnetic stimulation
NCT07036328 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to Slow Down Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer's Disease (AD): TMSLA - a Monocentric Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorWillem de HaanRan2025 to 2028Enrolled55ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Alzheimer Disease, Early OnsetArmsrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
NCT07075770 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Novel Personalized Non Invasive Combined Magnetic and Electrical Stimulation of the Default Mode Network in Mild AD Patients (CMES-AD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsAlzheimer DiseaseArmsCombined iTBS-tACS, iTBS-sham tACS, sham iTBS- sham tACS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systematic review and meta-analysis of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for activities of daily living in Alzheimer's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) on global cognitive function of elderly in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Giacomo KochDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6155-9439
Elias Paolo CasulaDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Sonia BonnìDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Ilaria BorghiDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Martina AssognaDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Marilena MineiDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Maria Concetta PellicciariDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Caterina MottaDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Alessia D'AcuntoDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Francesco PorrazziniDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Michele MaiellaDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Clarissa FerrariUnit of Statistics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, 25125, Brescia, Italy.
Carlo CaltagironeDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Emiliano SantarnecchiPrecision Neuroscience and Neuromodulation program, Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachussets General Hospital; Harvard Medical School, 02114, Boston, MA, USA.
Marco BozzaliRita Levi Montalcini Department of Neuroscience, University of Torino, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro MartoranaDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Fondazione Santa Lucia · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBCentro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · ITHarvard University · USUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is emerging as a non-invasive therapeutic strategy in the battle against Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's disease patients primarily show alterations of the default mode network for which the precuneus is a key node. Here, we hypothesized that targeting the precuneus with TMS represents a promising strategy to slow down cognitive and functional decline in Alzheimer's disease patients. We performed a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, phase 2, 24-week trial to determine the safety and efficacy of precuneus stimulation in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Fifty Alzheimer's disease patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either receive precuneus or sham rTMS (mean age 73.7 years; 52% female). The trial included a 24-week treatment, with a 2-week intensive course in which rTMS (or sham) was applied daily five times per week, followed by a 22-week maintenance phase in which stimulation was applied once weekly. The Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes was selected as the primary outcome measure, in which post-treatment scores were compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included score changes in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale, Mini-Mental State Examination and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living scale. Moreover, single-pulse TMS in combination with EEG was used to assess neurophysiological changes in precuneus cortical excitability and oscillatory activity. Our findings show that patients that received precuneus repetitive magnetic stimulation presented a stable performance of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes score, whereas patients treated with sham showed a worsening of their score. Compared with the sham stimulation, patients in the precuneus stimulation group also showed also significantly better performances for the secondary outcome measures, including the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale, Mini-Mental State Examination and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living scale. Neurophysiological results showed that precuneus cortical excitability remained unchanged after 24 weeks in the precuneus stimulation group, whereas it was significantly reduced in the sham group. Finally, we found an enhancement of local gamma oscillations in the group treated with precuneus stimulation but not in patients treated with sham. We conclude that 24 weeks of precuneus rTMS may slow down cognitive and functional decline in Alzheimer's disease. Repetitive TMS targeting the default mode network could represent a novel therapeutic approach in Alzheimer's disease patients.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseActivities of Daily LivingAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic PhenomenaMaleParietal LobeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAlzheimer’s diseasedefault mode networkplasticityprecuneustranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36281767
PMCPMC9679166
OpenAlexW4307198180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.