Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36281511›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2023

Performance Comparison Between Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy-based IR Biotyper and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Strain Diversity.

Son Young Jun, Young Ah Kim, Suk-Jun Lee, Woon-Won Jung, Hyun-Sook Kim, Sung-Soo Kim, Hyunsoo Kim, Dongeun Yong, Kyungwon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. FT-IR Spectroscopy to Discriminate Old from NewInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Son Young JunDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0127-7672
Young Ah KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9624-0126
Suk-Jun LeeDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Cheongju University, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0216-209X
Woon-Won JungDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Cheongju University, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7013-5993
Hyun-Sook KimDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Cheongju University, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9698-0968
Sung-Soo KimDepartment of Health Administration & Healthcare, Cheongju University, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7205-0758
Hyunsoo KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Police Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2164-7677
Dongeun YongResearch Institute of Bacterial Resistance and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1225-8477
Kyungwon LeeResearch Institute of Bacterial Resistance and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3788-2134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Development of an accessible method to routinely evaluate the clonality of strains is needed in microbiology laboratories. We compared the discriminatory power of the Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy-based IR Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany) to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as the reference method. Methods: Eighty-three extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Results: The SDI (95% confidence interval) was 0.969 (0.952-0.985) for WGS, 0.865 (0.807-0.924) for MALDI-TOF MS, and 0.974 (0.965-0.983) for IR Biotyper. Compared with WGS, IR Biotyper showed compatible diversity, whereas MALDI-TOF MS did not. The concordance and aRI improved from 66.3% to 84.3% and from 0.173 to 0.538, respectively, for IR Biotyper versus MALDI-TOF MS with WGS as the reference method. IR Biotyper showed substantially improved performance in strain typing compared with MALDI-TOF MS. Conclusions: IR Biotyper is useful for diversity analysis with improved discriminatory power over MALDI-TOF MS in comparison with WGS as a reference method. IR Biotyper is an accessible method to evaluate the clonality of strains and could be applied in epidemiological analysis during an outbreak of a health care facility, as well as for research on the transmission of resistant bacteria in community settings.

Indexed as

BacteriaEscherichia colibeta-LactamasesHumansLasersSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infraredbeta-LactamasesFourier-transform infraredMatrix-assisted laser desorption-ionizationSpectrometryWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36281511
PMCPMC9618903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.