GuidelineAnnals of laboratory medicine2023
Guidelines for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Monkeypox in Korea.
Guideline in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Global Health Alert on the Re-Emergence of Mpox a Viral Zoonotic Illness Its Prevention and Management: A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Re-emergence and clinical management of monkeypox: insights into viral biology, therapeutics, and vaccination.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- LAMPOX: A Portable and Rapid Molecular Diagnostic Assay for the Epidemic Clade IIb Mpox Virus Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Urogenital Manifestations in Mpox (Monkeypox) Infection: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Therapeutic Approaches.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Review
- Mpox virus: virology, molecular epidemiology, and global public health challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Navigating monkeypox: identifying risks and implementing solutions.Open veterinary journal · 2024Review
- Monkeypox: A Viral Zoonotic Disease of Rising Global Concern.Infectious diseases & immunity · 2024Review
- Monkeypox Diagnosis in Clinical Settings: A Comprehensive Review of Best Laboratory Practices.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Mpox: a review of laboratory detection techniques.Archives of virology · 2023Review
- Laboratory Diagnosis of Monkeypox in South Korea: Continuing the Collaboration With the Public Sector.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is ongoing, monkeypox has been rapidly spreading in non-endemic countries since May 2022. Accurate and rapid laboratory tests are essential for identifying and controlling monkeypox. Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine and the Korea Disease Prevention and Control Agency have proposed guidelines for diagnosing monkeypox in clinical laboratories in Korea. These guidelines cover the type of tests, selection of specimens, collection of specimens, diagnostic methods, interpretation of test results, and biosafety. Molecular tests are recommended as confirmatory tests. Skin lesion specimens are recommended for testing in the symptomatic stage, and the collection of both blood and oropharyngeal swabs is recommended in the presymptomatic or prodromal stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.