Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36281463›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2022

The Diagnostic Value of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as an Effective Biomarker for Eye Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.

Mohammad Shirvani, Farhad Soufi, Alireza Nouralishahi, Kimia Vakili, Amirhosseinn Salimi, Brandon Lucke-Wold, Farideh Mousavi, Saman Mohammadzadehsaliani, Shokoufeh Khanzadeh

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad ShirvaniGeriatric Ophthalmology Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3358-4087
Farhad SoufiIslamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza NouralishahiIsfahan Eye Research Center, Feiz Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Kimia VakiliStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amirhosseinn SalimiStudent Research Committee, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Brandon Lucke-WoldDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Farideh MousaviNikukari Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran.
Saman MohammadzadehsalianiIsfahan Eye Research Center, Feiz Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-5429
Shokoufeh KhanzadehStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-8746
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) reflects a dynamic relationship between the innate (neutrophils) and adaptive (lymphocytes) cellular immune response. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to critically evaluate the literature regarding the use of the NLR as a reliable means to detect several ocular disorders. Our study was registered with the PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022314850). Three databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Web of Science, were searched on September 9, 2022, with no restrictions on the article's language. Finally, 32 articles were recognized as eligible for our meta-analysis. We found that patients with eye diseases had significantly elevated levels of NLR in comparison to healthy controls (SMD =0.53, 95% CI =0.35-0.71,

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesNeutrophilsBiomarkersHumansInflammationLymphocyte CountLymphocytesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID36281463
PMCPMC9587911
OpenAlexW4306293777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.