Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36281453›Full record

ReviewiScience2022

Jakub Kostal, Bryan W Brooks, Christopher A Smith, Geetesh Devineni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakub KostalDepartment of Chemistry, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Bryan W BrooksDepartment of Environmental Science, Center for Reservoir and Aquatic Systems Research, Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
Christopher A SmithRedshift Technologies Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Geetesh DevineniDepartment of Chemistry, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

The effects of climate change on the natural attenuation and sedimentary record of harmful algal bloom toxins and microbial signalsP01ES028942 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI CHATTERJEE, SAURABH · 2018 to 2022
$5.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES028942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiquated and inefficient data-sharing practices represent one of the key obstacles to advancing sustainability goals through green chemistry. To this end, we need to robustly link data on chemical impacts with new chemical design strategies, which requires the development of next-generation data-sharing platforms to harmonize both data and efforts. These decentralized and interactive programs should be structured as

Indexed as

ChemistryEnvironmental toxicologyGreen chemistryOrganic chemistryToxicology

Identifiers

PMID36281453
PMCPMC9586998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.