Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36281431›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology open science2022

Impact of Ureteral Stent Material on Stent-related Symptoms: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Matthias Boeykens, Etienne X Keller, Andrea Bosio, Oliver J Wiseman, Pablo Contreras, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Michele Talso, Amelia Pietropaolo, Thomas Tailly, Vincent De Coninck

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prospective controlledCentral European journal of urology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pharmacological treatment of bladder stent symptoms.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Matthias BoeykensDepartment of Urology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Etienne X KellerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrea BosioDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Oliver J WisemanUrology Department, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Pablo ContrerasServicio de Urología, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eugenio VentimigliaYoung Academic Urologists Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Michele TalsoYoung Academic Urologists Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Amelia PietropaoloYoung Academic Urologists Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Thomas TaillyYoung Academic Urologists Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Vincent De ConinckYoung Academic Urologists Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
ADIR Association · FREuropean Association of Urology · NLAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBFondazione Ricerca Molinette · ITHospital Alemán · ARUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Ureteral stents are essential implants that are used on a daily basis. Since their invention, advances in stent design have been directed towards alleviating stent-related symptoms. It remains unclear how the material composition of the stent affects stent-related symptoms. Objective: To review the literature and define the clinical impact of ureteral stent material on stent-related symptoms. Evidence acquisition: A literature search of the Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and Web of Science databases was conducted on December 17, 2021 to collect articles comparing stent composition materials regarding stent-related symptoms. Thirteen publications met the inclusion criteria, of which only one met the high-quality requirements of the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials. Evidence synthesis: Most trials, including the highest quality trial, seem to support that silicone double-J (DJ) stents reduce stent-related symptoms compared to nonsilicone DJ stents. Regarding physical properties, it seems that "soft" or "flexible" DJ stents reduce stent-related symptoms. However, since there was only one high-quality study with a low risk of bias, it is impossible to draw a definitive conclusion owing to the lack of quality data. Conclusions: Silicone DJ stents, and by extension "soft" DJ stents, appear to reduce stent-related symptoms compared to nonsilicone polymers and "hard" DJ stents. No definitive conclusion can be drawn owing to a lack of quality evidence. Creating a standard for measuring and reporting physical stent properties should be the first step for further research. Patient summary: A ureteral stent is a small hollow tube placed inside the ureter to help urine drain from the kidney. We reviewed the literature on the impact of stent material on stent-related symptoms. We found that silicone may reduce stent-related symptoms, but no definitive conclusion can be drawn and further studies are needed.

Indexed as

Double-J stentMaterialReviewStent-related discomfortStent-related symptomsUreteral stentUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID36281431
PMCPMC9587365
OpenAlexW4306738654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.