Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36281374›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Mathematical modeling and analysis for the co-infection of COVID-19 and tuberculosis.

Kassahun Getnet Mekonen, Legesse Lemecha Obsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kassahun Getnet MekonenDepartment of Mathematics, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Legesse Lemecha ObsuDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a TB-COVID-19 co-infection epidemic model using a non-linear dynamical system by subdividing the human population into seven compartments. The biological well-posedness of the formulated mathematical model was studied via proving properties like boundedness of solutions, no-negativity, and the solution's dependence on the initial data. We then computed the reproduction numbers separately for TB and COVID-19 sub-models. The criterion for stability conditions for stationary points was examined. The basic reproduction number of sub-models used to suggest the mitigation and persistence of the diseases. Qualitative analysis of the sub-models revealed that the disease-free stationary points are both locally and globally stable provided the respective reproduction numbers are smaller than unit. The endemic stationary points for each sub-models were globally stable if their respective basic reproduction numbers are greater than unit. In each sub-model, we performed an analysis of sensitive parameters concerning the corresponding reproduction numbers. Results from sensitivity indices of the parameters revealed that deceasing contact rate and increasing the transferring rates from the latent stage to an infected class of individuals leads to mitigating the two diseases and their co-infections. We have also studied the analytical behavior of the full co-infection model by deriving the equilibrium points and investigating the conditions of their stability. The numerical experiments of the proposed co-infection model agree with the findings in the analytical results.

Indexed as

Co-infectionCOVID-19SensitivityStability analysisTB

Identifiers

PMID36281374
PMCPMC9583685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.