Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36281360›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Learning about the meanings of ambiguous words: evidence from a word-meaning priming paradigm with short narratives.

Lena M Blott, Oliver Hartopp, Kate Nation, Jennifer M Rodd

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lena M BlottDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Oliver HartoppDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kate NationDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jennifer M RoddDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluent language comprehension requires people to rapidly activate and integrate context-appropriate word meanings. This process is challenging for meanings of ambiguous words that are comparatively lower in frequency (

Indexed as

LanguageSemanticsAuditory PerceptionCuesHumansLearningContextual cuesLanguage comprehensionLexical ambiguityPriming

Identifiers

PMID36281360
PMCPMC9587715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.