Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36281344›Full record

ArticleNature physics2022

The optimal strategy balancing risk and speed predicts DNA damage checkpoint override times.

Ahmad Sadeghi, Roxane Dervey, Vojislav Gligorovski, Marco Labagnara, Sahand Jamal Rahi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Yeast centrosomes act as organizing centers to promote Polo kinase-mediated adaptation to persistent DNA damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Minimal shuttle vectors forSynthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Measuring and modeling the dynamics of mitotic error correction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmad SadeghiLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fÉdÉrale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Roxane DerveyLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fÉdÉrale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Vojislav GligorovskiLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fÉdÉrale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marco LabagnaraLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fÉdÉrale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sahand Jamal RahiLaboratory of the Physics of Biological Systems, Institute of Physics, École polytechnique fÉdÉrale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 204938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Checkpoints arrest biological processes allowing time for error correction. The phenomenon of checkpoint override (also known as checkpoint adaptation, slippage, or leakage), during cellular self-replication is biologically critical but currently lacks a quantitative, functional, or system-level understanding. To uncover fundamental laws governing error-correction systems, we derived a general theory of optimal checkpoint strategies, balancing the trade-off between risk and self-replication speed. Mathematically, the problem maps onto the optimization of an absorbing boundary for a random walk. We applied the theory to the DNA damage checkpoint (DDC) in budding yeast, an intensively researched model checkpoint. Using novel reporters for double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), we first quantified the probability distribution of DSB repair in time including rare events and, secondly, the survival probability after override. With these inputs, the optimal theory predicted remarkably accurately override times as a function of DSB numbers, which we measured precisely for the first time. Thus, a first-principles calculation revealed undiscovered patterns underlying highly noisy override processes. Our multi-DSB measurements revise well-known past results and show that override is more general than previously thought.

Identifiers

PMID36281344
PMCPMC7613727
OpenAlexW4280565118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.