ArticleACS photonics2022
Ultrafast Transverse Modulation of Free Electrons by Interaction with Shaped Optical Fields.
Article in ACS photonics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elastic quantum coupling between free electrons and photons.Science advances · 2026Article
- Realization of a Pre-Sample Photonic-Based Free-Electron Modulator in Ultrafast Transmission Electron Microscopes.ACS photonics · 2025Article
- Roadmap for Quantum Nanophotonics with Free Electrons.ACS photonics · 2025Review
- Ultrafast plasmonic rotors for electron beams.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Light-based electron aberration corrector.Nature photonics · 2025Article
- Quantum effects in the interaction of low-energy electrons with light.Science advances · 2024Article
- Electron-assisted probing of polaritonic light-matter states.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Angular Dispersion of Free-Electron-Light Coupling in an Optical Fiber-Integrated Metagrating.ACS photonics · 2024Article
- Article
- Optical polarization analogs in inelastic free-electron scattering.Science advances · 2023Article
- Numerical investigation of sequential phase-locked optical gating of free electrons.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Progress and Prospects in Optical Ultrafast Microscopy in the Visible Spectral Region: Transient Absorption and Two-Dimensional Microscopy.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2023Review
- Single-Pixel Imaging in Space and Time with Optically Modulated Free Electrons.ACS photonics · 2023Article
- Inelastic electron scattering at a single-beam structured light wave.Communications physics · 2023Article
- Entangling free electrons and optical excitations.Science advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatiotemporal electron-beam shaping is a bold frontier of electron microscopy. Over the past decade, shaping methods evolved from static phase plates to low-speed electrostatic and magnetostatic displays. Recently, a swift change of paradigm utilizing light to control free electrons has emerged. Here, we experimentally demonstrate arbitrary transverse modulation of electron beams without complicated electron-optics elements or material nanostructures, but rather using shaped light beams. On-demand spatial modulation of electron wavepackets is obtained via inelastic interaction with transversely shaped ultrafast light fields controlled by an external spatial light modulator. We illustrate this method for the cases of Hermite-Gaussian and Laguerre-Gaussian modulation and discuss their use in enhancing microscope sensitivity. Our approach dramatically widens the range of patterns that can be imprinted on the electron profile and greatly facilitates tailored electron-beam shaping.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.