ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2022
A case of intraocular inflammation after intravitreal brolucizumab injection monitored by laser flare-cell photometer.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- One-year results of the intravitreal administration of faricimab in patients with naïve type 3 macular neovascularization.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Two-year results of switching to intravitreal administration of faricimab in patients with aflibercept-refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Flare levels after intravitreal injection of brolucizumab for diabetic macular edema.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Article
- Baseline characteristics associated with the incidence of intraocular inflammation after the intravitreous injection of brolucizumab.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Subclinical Ocular Changes after Intravitreal Injections of Different Anti-VEGF Agents for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Intraocular Inflammation Secondary to Intravitreal Brolucizumab Injection for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Patient with Cognitive Impairment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Functional Outcomes of Brolucizumab-Induced Intraocular Inflammation Involving the Posterior Segment-A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- A Treat-and-Extend Regimen of Intravitreal Brolucizumab for Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Refractory to Aflibercept: A 12-Month Result.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report the efficacy of combination therapy using intravitreal injection of brolucizumab (IVbr) and sub-Tenon's injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) and of monitoring with a laser flare-cell photometer (LFP) in a case of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) with intraocular inflammation (IOI). Observations: A 72-year-old Japanese woman with PCV had her treatment switched to IVbr due to being refractory to aflibercept. Two weeks after starting IVbr, her visual acuity (VA) declined to 0.40 from 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA at baseline. In addition, the LFP flare increased to 51.2 photon count/ms (pc/ms) compared with the baseline of 16.1 pc/ms. We diagnosed her with the onset of IOI and immediately started treatment with sub-Tenon's injection of 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide (STTA). Two weeks after receiving STTA, her VA had recovered to 0.15 logMAR, and the LFP flare had decreased to 17.9 pc/ms with dry macula. Eight weeks after the first IVbr treatment, the logMAR VA had improved to -0.18 with achievement of dry macula and stabilization of the LFP flare at 12.2 pc/ms. We administered combined therapy using IVbr and STTA to our patient, and 12 weeks later, the logMAR VA remained at 0.00 with dry macula and 18.1 pc/ms for LFP flare. We continued combination therapy, and after 8 months, her logMAR VA remained at -0.08, and optical coherence tomography showed dry macula, while the LFP flare had stabilized at 16.6 pc/ms. Conclusions and Importance: Combination therapy of IVbr and STTA stabilized IOI and achieved dry macula. The LFP flare score clearly showed the degree of and changes in inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.