ReviewMetabolic engineering communications2022
Metabolomics and modelling approaches for systems metabolic engineering.
Review in Metabolic engineering communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Driving innovations in cancer research through spatial metabolomics: a bibliometric review of trends and hotspot.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Development of a metabolomic LC-QTOF method for bioactive compound production control in plant cell cultures.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Efficient synthesis of l-DOPA inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- Metabolomics in Infectious Diseases and Vaccine Response: Insights into Neglected Tropical and Non-Neglected Pathogens.Infectious disease reports · 2026Review
- Multi-omics research on moyamoya disease: current perspectives and future directions.Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Review
- Metabolomic Investigation of Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Multiple Myeloma, and Homozygous β-Thalassemia.Cells · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Methods and Omics for Mental Illness Diagnosis: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Seed Metabolomic Landscape Reflecting Key Differential Metabolic Profiles Among Different Wheat Cultivars.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Moving from genome-scale to community-scale metabolic models for the human gut microbiome.Nature microbiology · 2025Review
- Learning metabolic dynamics from irregular observations by Bidirectional Time-Series State Transfer Network.mSystems · 2024Article
- Strategies, Achievements, and Potential Challenges of Plant and Microbial Chassis in the Biosynthesis of Plant Secondary Metabolites.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Annotation-free discovery of functional groups in microbial communities.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- Recent advances in culture medium design for enhanced production of monoclonal antibodies in CHO cells: A comparative study of machine learning and systems biology approaches.Biotechnology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic engineering involves the manipulation of microbes to produce desirable compounds through genetic engineering or synthetic biology approaches. Metabolomics involves the quantitation of intracellular and extracellular metabolites, where mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance based analytical instrumentation are often used. Here, the experimental designs, sample preparations, metabolite quenching and extraction are essential to the quantitative metabolomics workflow. The resultant metabolomics data can then be used with computational modelling approaches, such as kinetic and constraint-based modelling, to better understand underlying mechanisms and bottlenecks in the synthesis of desired compounds, thereby accelerating research through systems metabolic engineering. Constraint-based models, such as genome scale models, have been used successfully to enhance the yield of desired compounds from engineered microbes, however, unlike kinetic or dynamic models, constraint-based models do not incorporate regulatory effects. Nevertheless, the lack of time-series metabolomic data generation has hindered the usefulness of dynamic models till today. In this review, we show that improvements in automation, dynamic real-time analysis and high throughput workflows can drive the generation of more quality data for dynamic models through time-series metabolomics data generation. Spatial metabolomics also has the potential to be used as a complementary approach to conventional metabolomics, as it provides information on the localization of metabolites. However, more effort must be undertaken to identify metabolites from spatial metabolomics data derived through imaging mass spectrometry, where machine learning approaches could prove useful. On the other hand, single-cell metabolomics has also seen rapid growth, where understanding cell-cell heterogeneity can provide more insights into efficient metabolic engineering of microbes. Moving forward, with potential improvements in automation, dynamic real-time analysis, high throughput workflows, and spatial metabolomics, more data can be produced and studied using machine learning algorithms, in conjunction with dynamic models, to generate qualitative and quantitative predictions to advance metabolic engineering efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.