Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36281204›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2022

Blood donation motivators and barriers reported by young, first-time whole blood donors: Examining the association of reported motivators and barriers with subsequent donation behavior and potential sex, race, and ethnic group differences.

Christopher R France, Janis L France, Dominic W Ysidron, Caroline D Martin, Louisa Duffy, Debra A Kessler, Mark Rebosa, Shiraz Rehmani, Victoria Frye, Beth H Shaz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher R FranceDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4723-0247
Janis L FranceDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0669-4253
Dominic W YsidronDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA.
Caroline D MartinDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA.
Louisa DuffyNew York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA.
Debra A KesslerNew York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mark RebosaNew York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA.
Shiraz RehmaniNew York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA.
Victoria FryeCity University of New York School of Medicine, Community Health and Social Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Beth H ShazDepartment of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2270-4821
New York Blood Center · USOhio University · USCity University of New York · USDuke University · US

Funding

Blood Donor Competence, Autonomy and Relatedness Enhancement (Blood Donor CARE)R01HL127766 · NHLBI · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI FRANCE, CHRISTOPHER R · 2016 to 2020
$3.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA greater understanding of young, first-time donor motivators and barriers is needed to address the ongoing challenge of retaining these essential donors. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsStructured interviews conducted with 508 young, first-time whole blood donors [66.1% female; Mean Age = 19.4 (SD = 2.5) years] were coded to identify reported motivators and barriers. Reported motivators and barriers were then examined for their association with attempted donation behavior over a 14-month follow-up, and for potential sex, race, and ethnic group differences in the frequency of endorsement.

resultsProsocial motivation (e.g., altruism) was the most commonly reported motivator and fear (e.g., fainting, needles) was the most commonly reported barrier. Donation behavior was unrelated to reported motivators, but was significantly related to four reported barriers including fear of fainting/dizziness, fear of needles/pain, having personal commitments that conflict with donating, and perceiving oneself as unsuited to donate for health reasons. Sex, racial, and ethnic differences were noted with respect to the percentages of donors reporting several donation-related motivators and barriers.

conclusionThe present findings identify donation-related barriers that could be important targets to address in the effort to encourage new young donors and to retain these new donors for the long term. Importantly, these data also highlight the importance of considering individual differences in donor motivation as a function of sex, race, and ethnicity.

Indexed as

Blood DonationBlood DonorsAdultEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultdonation barriersdonation motivatorsethnicityfirst-time donorsracesex

Identifiers

PMID36281204
PMCPMC9742189
OpenAlexW4307228094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.