Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36281189›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2022

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.

Haixia Cui, Yuan Huang, Weibo Wen, Xiangdan Li, Dongyuan Xu, Lan Liu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prognostic value ofScientific reports · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haixia CuiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Yanbian University hospital, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.
Yuan HuangCenter of Morphological Experiment, Medical College of Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.
Weibo WenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yanbian University Hospital, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3404-2738
Xiangdan LiCenter of Morphological Experiment, Medical College of Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.
Dongyuan XuCenter of Morphological Experiment, Medical College of Yanbian University, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.
Lan LiuDepartment of Pathology, Yanbian University Hospital, Yanji, Jilin Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in the existing tumor node metastasis classification system should be verified as one of the prognosis prediction factors. This work evaluated LNR's performance in predicting cervical cancer (CC) prognosis through a meta-analysis.

methodRelated studies were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. The language was restricted to English. The combined hazard ratios (HRs) were utilized to analyze the prognostic value of LNR.

resultsOur study included 8 articles with 3325 subjects published after 2015. Based on our analysis, high LNR was the adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (OS, HR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.23-1.73; P = .238) and disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 2.69; 95% CI = 1.98-3.66; P = .597) among the CC cases. Furthermore, as revealed by subgroup analysis, in CC patients, median LNR of about 0.0625 and 0.066 served as the prominent risk factor for DFS and OS.

conclusionsThe current work illustrates that elevated LNR is related to the dismal prognosis of CC. More well-designed clinical studies are warranted for assessing whether LNR is a factor independently predicting the prognosis of CC.

Indexed as

Lymph NodesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph Node RatioNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36281189
PMCPMC9592518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.