Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36280872›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2022

Extracellular vesicles from oviductal and uterine fluids supplementation in sequential in vitro culture improves bovine embryo quality.

Cláudia Lima Verde Leal, Karina Cañón-Beltrán, Yulia N Cajas, Meriem Hamdi, Aracelli Yaryes, María Gemma Millán de la Blanca, Paula Beltrán-Breña, Rosane Mazzarella, Juliano Coelho da Silveira, Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Recent Advances and Emerging Applications in Embryo Vitrification for Livestock.Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Animal reproduction · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Cláudia Lima Verde LealDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Center Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (CSIC-INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain. clvleal@usp.br.
Karina Cañón-BeltránDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Center Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (CSIC-INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Yulia N CajasDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Center Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (CSIC-INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Meriem HamdiDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Center Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (CSIC-INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Aracelli YaryesDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Center Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (CSIC-INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
María Gemma Millán de la BlancaDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Center Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (CSIC-INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Paula Beltrán-BreñaDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Center Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (CSIC-INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Rosane MazzarellaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo (FZEA-USP), Pirassununga, Brazil.
Juliano Coelho da SilveiraDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo (FZEA-USP), Pirassununga, Brazil.
Alfonso Gutiérrez-AdánDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Center Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (CSIC-INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Encina M GonzálezDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Center Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (CSIC-INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Dimitrios RizosDepartment of Animal Reproduction, National Center Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (CSIC-INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain. drizos@inia.csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6813-3940
Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ESUniversidade de São Paulo · BRConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity of Cuenca · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn vitro production of bovine embryos is a well-established technology, but the in vitro culture (IVC) system still warrants improvements, especially regarding embryo quality. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolated from oviductal (OF) and uterine fluid (UF) in sequential IVC on the development and quality of bovine embryos. Zygotes were cultured in SOF supplemented with either BSA or EVs-depleted fetal calf serum (dFCS) in the presence (BSA-EV and dFCS-EV) or absence of EVs from OF (D1 to D4) and UF (D5 to D8), mimicking in vivo conditions. EVs from oviducts (early luteal phase) and uterine horns (mid-luteal phase) from slaughtered heifers were isolated by size exclusion chromatography. Blastocyst rate was recorded on days 7-8 and their quality was assessed based on lipid contents, mitochondrial activity and total cell numbers, as well as survival rate after vitrification. Relative mRNA abundance for lipid metabolism-related transcripts and levels of phosphorylated hormone-sensitive lipase (pHSL) proteins were also determined. Additionally, the expression levels of 383 miRNA in OF- and UF-EVs were assessed by qRT-PCR.

resultsBlastocyst yield was lower (P < 0.05) in BSA treatments compared with dFCS treatments. Survival rates after vitrification/warming were improved in dFCS-EVs (P < 0.05). EVs increased (P < 0.05) blastocysts total cell number in dFCS-EV and BSA-EV compared with respective controls (dFCS and BSA), while lipid content was decreased in dFCS-EV (P < 0.05) and mitochondrial activity did not change (P > 0.05). Lipid metabolism transcripts were affected by EVs and showed interaction with type of protein source in medium (PPARGC1B, LDLR, CD36, FASN and PNPLA2, P < 0.05). Levels of pHSL were lower in dFCS (P < 0.05). Twenty miRNA were differentially expressed between OF- and UF-EVs and only bta-miR-148b was increased in OF-EVs (P < 0.05).

conclusionsMimicking physiological conditions using EVs from OF and UF in sequential IVC does not affect embryo development but improves blastocyst quality regarding survival rate after vitrification/warming, total cell number, lipid content, and relative changes in expression of lipid metabolism transcripts and lipase activation. Finally, EVs miRNA contents may contribute to the observed effects.

Indexed as

CattleCryopreservationEmbryo developmentExosomesLipid metabolismmiRNAsOviductUterus

Identifiers

PMID36280872
PMCPMC9594899
OpenAlexW4307182633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.