Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36280846›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Delegation of patient related tasks to allied health assistants: a time motion study.

David A Snowdon, Olivia A King, Amy Dennett, Jo-Anne Pinson, Michelle M Shannon, Taya A Collyer, Annette Davis, Cylie M Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David A SnowdonPeninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia. david.snowdon@monash.edu.
Olivia A KingMonash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Amy DennettAllied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.
Jo-Anne PinsonMedical Imaging Department, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Michelle M ShannonPeninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
Taya A CollyerPeninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
Annette DavisAllied Health Workforce Innovation Strategy Education Research (WISER) unit, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Cylie M WilliamsAcademic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllied health assistants (AHAs) are support staff who complete patient and non-patient related tasks under the delegation of an allied health professional. Delegating patient related tasks to AHAs can benefit patients and allied health professionals. However, it is unclear whether the AHA workforce is utilised optimally in the provision of patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of time AHAs spend on patient related tasks during their working day and any differences across level of AHA experience, clinical setting, and profession delegating the task.

methodsA time motion study was conducted using a self-report, task predominance work sampling method. AHAs were recruited from four publicly-funded health organisations in Victoria, Australia. AHAs worked with dietitians, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, podiatrists, social workers, speech pathologists, psychologists, and exercise physiologists. The primary outcome was quantity of time spent by AHAs on individual task-categories. Tasks were grouped into two main categories: patient or non-patient related activities. Data were collected from July 2020 to May 2021 using an activity capture proforma specifically designed for this study. Logistic mixed-models were used to investigate the extent to which level of experience, setting, and delegating profession were associated with time spent on patient related tasks.

resultsData from 51 AHAs showed that AHAs spent more time on patient related tasks (293 min/day, 64%) than non-patient related tasks (167 min/day, 36%). Time spent in community settings had lower odds of being delegated to patient related tasks than time in the acute hospital setting (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.69, P < 0.001). Time delegated by exercise physiologists and dietitians was more likely to involve patient related tasks than time delegated by physiotherapists (exercise physiology: OR 3.77, 95% 1.90 to 7.70, P < 0.001; dietetics: OR 2.60, 95%CI 1.40 to 1.90, P = 0.003). Time delegated by other professions (e.g. podiatry, psychology) had lower odds of involving patient related tasks than physiotherapy (OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.85, P = 0.02).

conclusionAHAs may be underutilised in community settings, and by podiatrists and psychologists. These areas may be targeted to understand appropriateness of task delegation to optimise AHAs' role in providing patient care.

Indexed as

Allied Health OccupationsAllied Health PersonnelDelegation, ProfessionalDieteticsHumansVictoriaWorkforceAllied Health OccupationsAllied Health ProfessionalDelegationHealthcare AssistantHealthcare Support WorkersHealth WorkforceSupervisionTime Motion Studies

Identifiers

PMID36280846
PMCPMC9590386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.