Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36280707›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2023

Advances in CRISPR therapeutics.

Michael Chavez, Xinyi Chen, Paul B Finn, Lei S Qi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Bacterial immune systems.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Programmable nanobody circuits for cell selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael Chavez *Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Xinyi Chen *Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3365-4284
Paul B FinnDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lei S QiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. stanley.qi@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3965-3223
Stanford University · USStanford Health Care · US

Funding

Engineering and Imaging 3D genome structure-function dynamics across time scalesU01DK127405 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BLOBEL, GERD A, PHILLIPS-CREMINS, JENNIFER ELIZABETH · 2020 to 2024
$5.7M
High resolution dissection of oncogene enhancer networks via CRISPR screening and live-cell imaging.R01CA266470 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Lei Stanley Qi · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
A Cas13d-based screening approach to engineer exhaustion-resistant CAR T cellsR21CA270609 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI QI, LEI STANLEY · 2022 to 2023
$399k
Engineered Regulatory T cells with Enhanced Stability and Suppression for AutoimmunityF31AI164936 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHAVEZ, MICHAEL GREGORY · 2021 to 2021
$39k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA266470NCI NIH HHS R21 CA270609NIAID NIH HHS F31 AI164936NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK127405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) renaissance was catalysed by the discovery that RNA-guided prokaryotic CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins can create targeted double-strand breaks in mammalian genomes. This finding led to the development of CRISPR systems that harness natural DNA repair mechanisms to repair deficient genes more easily and precisely than ever before. CRISPR has been used to knock out harmful mutant genes and to fix errors in coding sequences to rescue disease phenotypes in preclinical studies and in several clinical trials. However, most genetic disorders result from combinations of mutations, deletions and duplications in the coding and non-coding regions of the genome and therefore require sophisticated genome engineering strategies beyond simple gene knockout. To overcome this limitation, the toolbox of natural and engineered CRISPR-Cas systems has been dramatically expanded to include diverse tools that function in human cells for precise genome editing and epigenome engineering. The application of CRISPR technology to edit the non-coding genome, modulate gene regulation, make precise genetic changes and target infectious diseases has the potential to lead to curative therapies for many previously untreatable diseases.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAnimalsDNA RepairGenomeHumansMammals

Identifiers

PMID36280707
PMCPMC9589773
OpenAlexW4307386237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.