Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36280559›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Using narratives to inform the development of a digital health intervention related to COVID-19 vaccination in Black young adults in Georgia, North Carolina and Alabama.

Marie C D Stoner, David Tweedy, Maria G Leonora Comello, Christina Toval, Audrey E Pettifor, Margo Adams Larsen, Alejandro Baez, Allysha C Maragh-Bass, Elizabeth E Tolley, Erica N Browne and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marie C D StonerRTI International, Berkeley, CA, USA. Electronic address: mcstoner@rti.org.
David TweedyRTI International, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Maria G Leonora ComelloUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Christina TovalUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Audrey E PettiforUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Margo Adams LarsenVirtually Better Inc., Decatur, GA, USA.
Alejandro BaezRTI International, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Allysha C Maragh-BassFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Elizabeth E TolleyFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Erica N BrowneRTI International, Berkeley, CA, USA.
LaRisa AndersonUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kathryn E MuessigUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Henna BudhwaniFlorida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Lisa B Hightow-WeidmanUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USRTI International · USFamily Health International 360 · USFlorida State University · US

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
A multidimensional Digital Approach to Address Vaccine Hesitancy and Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake among African American Young Adults in the SouthR01MD016834 · NIMHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUDHWANI, HENNA, HIGHTOW-WEIDMAN, LISA B · 2021 to 2024
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD016834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactive stories are a relatively newer form of storytelling with great potential to correct misinformation while increasing self-efficacy, which is crucial to vaccine acceptance. To address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and medical mistrust in young Black adults (BYA), we sought to adapt a pre-existing application ("app"; Tough Talks) designed to address HIV disclosure decision-making through choose-your-own adventure (CYOA) narratives and other activities. The adapted app (Tough Talks - COVID) uses a similar approach to situate COVID-19 vaccination decision-making within social contexts and to encourage greater deliberation about decisions. To inform content for the CYOA narratives, we conducted an online survey that was used to elicit the behavioral, cognitive, and environmental determinants influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among 150 BYA (ages 18-29) in Georgia, Alabama, and North Carolina. The survey included scenario questions that were developed with input from a youth advisory board to understand responses to peer and family influences. In two scenarios that involved discussions with family and friends about vaccination status, most respondents chose to be honest about their vaccination status. However, vaccinated individuals perceived more social pressure and stigma about not being vaccinated than unvaccinated respondents who were not as motivated by social pressure. Personal choice/agency in the face of perceived vaccine risks was a more common theme for unvaccinated respondents. Results suggest that relying on changing social norms alone may not impact barriers to vaccination in unvaccinated young adults without also addressing other barriers to vaccination such as concerns about autonomy and vaccine safety. Based on these findings, CYOA narratives in the app were adapted to include discussions with family and friends but also to touch on themes of personal choice as well as other topics that influence behaviors besides norms such as safety, side effects, and risk of COVID-19 in an evolving pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAdultAlabamaGeorgiaHumansNorth CarolinaTrustVaccinationYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinationDigital Health InterventionMistrustNarrativesVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36280559
PMCPMC9581799
OpenAlexW4306931941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.