Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36280398›Full record

ArticleInternational dental journal2023

The Utilisation of CAD/CAM Technology Amongst Austrian Dentists: A Pilot Study.

Tihomir Krastev, Michael Payer, Zhivko Krastev, Juan Francisco Pena Cardelles, Adam Vegh, Dorottya Banyai, Zoltan Geczi, Daniel Vegh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review on patient perceptions and clinician-reported outcomes when comparing digital and analog workflows for complete dentures.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of scanning errors on the trueness of digital implant impressions.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessment of Digital Dentistry Knowledge and Practices Among Dental Students at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tihomir KrastevDepartment of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, University Clinic of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Michael PayerFaculty of Computer Science and Biomedical Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Zhivko KrastevDepartment of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Francisco Pena CardellesDepartment of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Adam VeghDepartment of Oromaxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Dorottya BanyaiDepartment of Pedodontics and Orthodontics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltan GecziDepartment of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Daniel VeghDepartment of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, University Clinic of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: vegh.daniel@dent.semmelweis-univ.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComputer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) technology in dentistry has become noticeably more significant in recent years. The further development of CAD/CAM systems has led to a broader range of applications, more user-friendly operation, and improved accessibility. The present online survey aimed to investigate CAD/CAM technology utilisation amongst Austrian dentists as the first social media pilot study from Europe on this specific topic. MATERIALS AND

methodsFor this purpose, an online survey consisting of 27 questions was created using Google Forms. The questions were divided into 3 sections: general inquiries, questions for CAD/CAM users, and questions for nonusers. The questionnaire was randomly distributed to Austrian dentists via email and social media. A total of 115 responses were submitted.

resultsThe vast majority of respondents, 52.6% (n = 60), practised as general dentists. Furthermore, a significant proportion of participants specialised in oral surgery, 17.5% (n = 20), and orthodontics, 12.3% (n = 14). Approximately half of the respondents, 51.8% (n = 59), reported having a CAD/CAM device at their current workplace. Amongst the CAD/CAM users, 70.7% (n = 58) believed that CAD/CAM is important in increasing the number of patients visiting the dental practice. In total, 54.2% (n = 26) of nonusers indicated the high initial cost of purchasing a CAD/CAM device as the main reason for not utilising this technology.

conclusionsCAD/CAM technology appears to have infiltrated the workflow of Austrian dentists with predictions of growing implementation amongst dental practices in the future.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignDental Prosthesis DesignAustriaDentistsHumansPilot ProjectsTechnologyCAD-CAMDigital dentistryIntraoral scannerSocial mediaSurvey

Identifiers

PMID36280398
PMCPMC10213771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.