Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36280238›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2023

American College of Rheumatology/EULAR remission criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: 2022 revision.

Paul Studenic, Daniel Aletaha, Maarten de Wit, Tanja A Stamm, Farideh Alasti, Diane Lacaille, Josef S Smolen, David T Felson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Paul StudenicDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden paul.studenic@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-8895-6941
Daniel AletahaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2108-0030
Maarten de WitEULAR community of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8428-6354
Tanja A StammDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3073-7284
Farideh AlastiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Diane LacailleDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Josef S SmolenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
David T FelsonSection of Rheumatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2668-2447
Medical University of Vienna · ATBoston University · USEuropean League Against Rheumatism · CHKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean-based and index-based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement between the two sets of criteria, our goals were to externally validate a revision of the Boolean remission criteria using a higher PtGA threshold and to validate the provisionally endorsed index-based criteria.

methodsWe used data from four randomised trials comparing biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to methotrexate or placebo. We tested the higher proposed PtGA threshold of 2 cm (Boolean2.0) (range 0-10 cm) compared with the original threshold of 1 cm (Boolean1.0). We analysed agreement between the Boolean-based and index-based criteria (Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)) for remission and examined how well each remission definition predicted later good physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score≤0.5) and radiographic non-progression.

resultsData from 2048 trial participants, 1101 with early RA and 947 with established RA, were included. The proportion of patients with disease in remission at 6 months after treatment initiation increased when using Boolean2.0 compared with Boolean1.0, from 14.8% to 20.6% in early RA and 4.2% to 6.0% in established RA. Agreement between Boolean2.0 and the SDAI or CDAI remission criteria was better than for Boolean1.0, particularly in early disease. Boolean2.0, SDAI, and CDAI remission criteria had similar positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to predict radiographic nonprogression and a HAQ score of ≤0.5 (positive LR 3.8-4.3). The omission of PtGA (BooleanX) worsened the prediction of good functional outcomes.

conclusionUsing the Boolean 2.0 criteria classifies, more patients as achieving remission and increases the agreement with index-based remission criteria without jeopardising predictive value for radiographic or functional outcomes. This revised Boolean definition and the previously provisionally endorsed index-based criteria were endorsed by ACR and EULAR.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidRheumatologyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID36280238
PMCPMC9811102
OpenAlexW4307228818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.