Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36280099›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Computation of transcranial magnetic stimulation electric fields using self-supervised deep learning.

Hongming Li, Zhi-De Deng, Desmond Oathes, Yong Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hongming LiCenter for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Zhi-De DengComputational Neurostimulation Research Program, Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics & Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, MD 20892, USA.
Desmond OathesCenter for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Yong FanCenter for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: Yong.Fan@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

Personalized Functional Network Modeling to Characterize and Predict Psychopathology in YouthR01EB022573 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Yong Fan, Theodore Satterthwaite · 2016 to 2026
$6.0M
Individualized Closed Loop TMS for Working Memory EnhancementR01MH120811 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FAN, YONG, OATHES, DESMOND · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Fast and robust deep learning tools for analysis of neuroimaging data of Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG066650 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FAN, YONG · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
Biomedical Image Computing and Informatics ClusterS10OD023495 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066650NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022573NIH HHS S10 OD023495NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electric fields (E-fields) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be modeled using partial differential equations (PDEs). Using state-of-the-art finite-element methods (FEM), it often takes tens of seconds to solve the PDEs for computing a high-resolution E-field, hampering the wide application of the E-field modeling in practice and research. To improve the E-field modeling's computational efficiency, we developed a self-supervised deep learning (DL) method to compute precise TMS E-fields. Given a head model and the primary E-field generated by TMS coils, a DL model was built to generate a E-field by minimizing a loss function that measures how well the generated E-field fits the governing PDE. The DL model was trained in a self-supervised manner, which does not require any external supervision. We evaluated the DL model using both a simulated sphere head model and realistic head models of 125 individuals and compared the accuracy and computational speed of the DL model with a state-of-the-art FEM. In realistic head models, the DL model obtained accurate E-fields that were significantly correlated with the FEM solutions. The DL model could obtain precise E-fields within seconds for whole head models at a high spatial resolution, faster than the FEM. The DL model built for the simulated sphere head model also obtained an accurate E-field whose average difference from the analytical E-fields was 0.0054, comparable to the FEM solution. These results demonstrated that the self-supervised DL method could obtain precise E-fields comparable to the FEM solutions with improved computational speed.

Indexed as

Deep LearningTranscranial Magnetic StimulationElectromagnetic FieldsHeadHumansDeep neural networksElectric field modelingSelf-supervised learningTMS

Identifiers

PMID36280099
PMCPMC9854270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.