Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36279696›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2022

Comparison of two antibody screening systems for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in recovered and vaccinated subjects - test performance and possible indicators for immunity.

Rebecca Jonczyk, Nils Stanislawski, Lisa K Seiler, Somayeh Ahani, Arne Bueltemeier, Frank Stahl, Sascha Beutel, Holger Blume, Corinna Hauß, Anette Melk and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca JonczykInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: rjonczyk@iftc.uni-hannover.de.
Nils StanislawskiInstitute of Microelectronic Systems, Architectures and Systems Group, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany.
Lisa K SeilerInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany.
Somayeh AhaniInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany.
Arne BueltemeierInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany.
Frank StahlInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany.
Sascha BeutelInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany.
Holger BlumeInstitute of Microelectronic Systems, Architectures and Systems Group, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany.
Corinna HaußMVZ Labor Limbach Hannover GbR, Germany.
Anette MelkDepartment of Pediatric Kidney, Liver, and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Mira PaulsenDepartment of Pediatric Kidney, Liver, and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Meike StieschClinic for Dental Prosthetics and Biomedical Materials Science, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Andreas WinkelClinic for Dental Prosthetics and Biomedical Materials Science, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Philipp-Cornelius PottClinic for Dental Prosthetics and Biomedical Materials Science, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Giulietta SalettiResearch Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Mariana González-HernándezResearch Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Franziska Karola KaiserResearch Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Guus F RimmelzwaanResearch Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Albert D M E OsterhausResearch Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Cornelia BlumeInstitute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: blume@iftc.uni-hannover.de.
Leibniz University Hannover · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetection of seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2-infection or vaccination is relevant to discover subclinical cases and recognize patients with a possible immunity.

objectivesTest performance, effects of age, time-point of seroconversion and immune status regarding neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and T-cell-reactivity were investigated. STUDY

designTwo antibody assays (Viramed-Test for S/N-specific IgG, Roche-Test for N-specific IgA, -M, -G) were evaluated with classified samples. In total, 381 subjects aged 6-99 years, who had either recovered from the disease or had been vaccinated, were screened for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. This screening was part of an open observational study with working adults. Additionally, children and adults were analyzed in a longitudinal COVID-19 study in schools. For immunity evaluation, virus neutralization tests and ELISpot tests were performed in a subgroup of subjects.

resultsViramed revealed a slightly lower test performance than Roche, but test quality was equally well in samples from very young or very old donors. The time-point of seroconversion after the respective immunization detected by the two tests was not significantly different. N-specific antibodies, detected with Roche, highly correlated with NAbs in recovered subjects, whereas a positive Viramed-Test result was paralleled by a positive ELISpot result.

conclusionViramed-Test was not as sensitive as Roche-Test, but highly specific and beneficial to distinguish between recovered and vaccinated status. For both tests correlations with humoral and cellular immunity were found. Of note, the expected early detection of IgA and IgM by the Roche-Test did not prove to be an advantage over IgG testing by Viramed.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralChildHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GNeutralizing antibodiesSARS-CoV-2-specific antibodiesSeroconversionT-cell-reactivityTest performance

Identifiers

PMID36279696
PMCPMC9576262
OpenAlexW4306646268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.