ArticleJournal of binocular vision and ocular motility
Evaluation and Management of Divergence Insufficiency-Type Esotropia.
Article in Journal of binocular vision and ocular motility. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of Saccade Characteristics During Fusional Vergence Tests in Normal Binocular Vision Participants.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Divergence insufficiency-type ET is a common cause of distance diplopia in elderly adults. A recent prospective multicenter data collection study has provided additional guidance on management. Either base-out prism glasses or strabismus surgery were found to have high success rates, based on patient report of diplopia, and health-related quality-of-life domain scores. It was concluded that either prism or surgery were reasonable initial treatment strategies. Although allocation bias precluded formal comparison of prism versus surgery (evident in baseline differences between groups), there were hints that surgery may yield superior outcomes. For surgery, the most common approach was bilateral medial rectus recession, which was highly successful when assessed 10 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. It was unclear whether adjustable sutures were helpful, but in the vast majority of adjustable cases, additional recession at the time of adjustment was performed, suggesting that larger than standard surgical doses are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36279481PMC9608332What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.