Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36279392›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2022

Murine Central Nervous System and Bone Marrow Distribution of the Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib: Pharmacokinetics and Exposure at the Sites of Efficacy and Toxicity.

Ju-Hee Oh, Erica A Power, Wenjuan Zhang, David J Daniels, William F Elmquist

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Preclinical Modeling of Navtemadlin Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy in IDH-Wild-type Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ju-Hee OhBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J-H.O., W.Z., W.F.E.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.A.P., D.J.D.); and Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.A.P.) oh000074@umn.edu elmqu011@umn.edu.
Erica A PowerBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J-H.O., W.Z., W.F.E.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.A.P., D.J.D.); and Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.A.P.).
Wenjuan ZhangBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J-H.O., W.Z., W.F.E.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.A.P., D.J.D.); and Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.A.P.).
David J DanielsBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J-H.O., W.Z., W.F.E.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.A.P., D.J.D.); and Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.A.P.).
William F ElmquistBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J-H.O., W.Z., W.F.E.); Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.A.P., D.J.D.); and Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (E.A.P.) oh000074@umn.edu elmqu011@umn.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Trans Network ProjectU54CA210180 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SARKARIA, JANN N., WHITE, FOREST M · 2016 to 2020
$10.2M
Therapy Evaluation CoreU19CA264362 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PARNEY, IAN F · 2021 to 2025
$7.6M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002380 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity T. B. Enders, ANTHONY John WINDEBANK · 2017 to 2026
$6.0M
Pre-Clinical Novel Radiosensitizer Evaluation Program for Brain TumorsU01CA227954 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SARKARIA, JANN N. · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Working towards targeted therapy in H3K27M tumors: Aurora Kinase Inhibitors and the role of epigenome programmingR01NS117432 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI DANIELS, DAVID · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002380NCI NIH HHS U01 CA227954NCI NIH HHS U19 CA264362NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210180NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Important challenges in developing drugs that target central nervous system (CNS) tumors include overcoming barriers for CNS delivery and reducing systemic side effects. Alisertib, an aurora A kinase inhibitor, has been examined for treatment of several CNS tumors in preclinical and clinical studies. In this study, we investigated the distribution of alisertib into the CNS, the site of efficacy for brain tumors, and into the bone marrow, the site of dose-limiting toxicity leading to myelosuppression. Mechanisms influencing site-specific distribution, such as active transport mediated by the efflux proteins, p-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp), were examined. Alisertib exposure to the brain in wild-type mice was less than 1% of that in the plasma, and was evenly distributed throughout various brain regions and the spinal cord. Studies using transporter knockout mice and pharmacological inhibition show that alisertib CNS distribution is influenced by P-gp, but not Bcrp. Conversely, upon systemic administration, alisertib distribution to the bone marrow occurred rapidly, was not significantly limited by efflux transporters, and reached higher concentrations than in the CNS. This study demonstrates that, given an equivalent distributional driving force exposure in plasma, the exposure of alisertib in the brain is significantly less than that in the bone marrow, suggesting that targeted delivery may be necessary to guarantee therapeutic efficacy with minimal risk for adverse events.Therefore, these data suggest that, to improve the therapeutic index when using alisertib for brain tumors, a localized regional delivery, such as convection-enhanced delivery, may be warranted. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The CNS penetration of alisertib is limited with uniform distribution in various regions of the brain, and P-gp efflux is an important mechanism limiting that CNS distribution. Alisertib rapidly distributes into the bone marrow, a site of toxicity, with a greater exposure than in the CNS, a possible site of efficacy. These results suggest a need to design localized delivery strategies to improve the CNS exposure of alisertib and limit systemic toxicities in the treatment of brain tumors.

Indexed as

Aurora Kinase ABrain NeoplasmsAnimalsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2AzepinesBone MarrowCentral Nervous SystemMiceMice, KnockoutNeoplasm ProteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2Aurora Kinase AAzepinesMLN 8237Neoplasm ProteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID36279392
PMCPMC9513880
OpenAlexW4289918825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.