Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36279300›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

The acceptability of the AMBITION-cm treatment regimen for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: Findings from a qualitative methods study of participants and researchers in Botswana and Uganda.

David S Lawrence, Agnes Ssali, Neo Moshashane, Georgina Nabaggala, Lebogang Maphane, Thomas S Harrison, David B Meya, Joseph N Jarvis, Janet Seeley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How Applicable Is the Single-Dose AMBITION Regimen for Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Cryptococcal Meningitis to High-Income Settings?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cryptococcal meningitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

David S LawrenceDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5439-4039
Agnes SsaliSocial Aspects of Health Programme, MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Neo MoshashaneBotswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.
Georgina NabaggalaSocial Aspects of Health Programme, MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Lebogang MaphaneBotswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.
Thomas S HarrisonInstitute of Infection and Immunity, St George's University London, London, United Kingdom.
David B MeyaInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Joseph N JarvisDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Janet SeeleySocial Aspects of Health Programme, MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBBotswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership · BWInfectious Diseases Institute · UGSt George's, University of London · GBUganda Virus Research Institute · UG

Funding

Department of Health RP-2017-08-ST2-012Medical Research Council MC_PC_MR/P006922/1Medical Research Council MR/P006922/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe AMBITION-cm trial for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis demonstrated that a single, high-dose of liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome) plus 14-days of oral flucytosine and fluconazole was non-inferior in terms of all-cause mortality to 7-days of amphotericin B deoxycholate and flucytosine followed by 7-days of fluconazole (Control). The AmBisome regimen was associated with fewer adverse events. We explored the acceptability of the AmBisome regimen from the perspective of participants and providers.

methodsWe embedded a qualitative methods study within the AMBITION-cm sites in Botswana and Uganda. We conducted in-depth interviews with trial participants, surrogate decision makers, and researchers and combined these with direct observations. Interviews were transcribed, translated, and analysed thematically.

resultsWe interviewed 38 trial participants, 20 surrogate decision makers, and 31 researchers. Participant understanding of the trial was limited; however, there was a preference for the AmBisome regimen due to the single intravenous dose and fewer side effects. More time was required to prepare the single AmBisome dose but this was felt to be acceptable given subsequent reductions in workload. The AmBisome regimen was reported to be associated with fewer episodes of rigors and thrombophlebitis and a reduction in the number of intravenous cannulae required. Less intensive monitoring and management was required for participants in the AmBisome arm.

conclusionsThe AmBisome regimen was highly acceptable, being simpler to administer despite the initial time investment required. The regimen was well tolerated and associated with less toxicity and resultant management. Widespread implementation would reduce the clinical workload of healthcare workers caring for patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMeningitis, CryptococcalAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsBotswanaDrug Therapy, CombinationFluconazoleFlucytosineHumansUgandaAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleFlucytosineliposomal amphotericin B

Identifiers

PMID36279300
PMCPMC9632910
OpenAlexW4307180670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.