Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36279288›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Modelling the first wave of COVID-19 in India.

Dhiraj Kumar Hazra, Bhalchandra S Pujari, Snehal M Shekatkar, Farhina Mozaffer, Sitabhra Sinha, Vishwesha Guttal, Pinaki Chaudhuri, Gautam I Menon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dhiraj Kumar HazraThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences, CIT Campus, Taramani, Chennai, INDIA.ORCID 0000-0001-7041-4143
Bhalchandra S PujariDepartment of Scientific Computing, Modeling and Simulation, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Ganeshkhind, Pune, INDIA.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-3766
Snehal M ShekatkarDepartment of Scientific Computing, Modeling and Simulation, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Ganeshkhind, Pune, INDIA.ORCID 0000-0002-3442-8289
Farhina MozafferThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences, CIT Campus, Taramani, Chennai, INDIA.ORCID 0000-0002-4707-6307
Sitabhra SinhaThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences, CIT Campus, Taramani, Chennai, INDIA.ORCID 0000-0002-3004-1079
Vishwesha GuttalCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, INDIA.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-857X
Pinaki ChaudhuriThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences, CIT Campus, Taramani, Chennai, INDIA.ORCID 0000-0002-9722-8364
Gautam I MenonThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences, CIT Campus, Taramani, Chennai, INDIA.ORCID 0000-0001-5528-4002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating the burden of COVID-19 in India is difficult because the extent to which cases and deaths have been undercounted is hard to assess. Here, we use a 9-component, age-stratified, contact-structured epidemiological compartmental model, which we call the INDSCI-SIM model, to analyse the first wave of COVID-19 spread in India. We use INDSCI-SIM, together with Bayesian methods, to obtain optimal fits to daily reported cases and deaths across the span of the first wave of the Indian pandemic, over the period Jan 30, 2020 to Feb 15, 2021. We account for lock-downs and other non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), an overall increase in testing as a function of time, the under-counting of cases and deaths, and a range of age-specific infection-fatality ratios. We first use our model to describe data from all individual districts of the state of Karnataka, benchmarking our calculations using data from serological surveys. We then extend this approach to aggregated data for Karnataka state. We model the progress of the pandemic across the cities of Delhi, Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru and Chennai, and then for India as a whole. We estimate that deaths were undercounted by a factor between 2 and 5 across the span of the first wave, converging on 2.2 as a representative multiplier that accounts for the urban-rural gradient. We also estimate an overall under-counting of cases by a factor of between 20 and 25 towards the end of the first wave. Our estimates of the infection fatality ratio (IFR) are in the range 0.05-0.15, broadly consistent with previous estimates but substantially lower than values that have been estimated for other LMIC countries. We find that approximately 35% of India had been infected overall by the end of the first wave, results broadly consistent with those from serosurveys. These results contribute to the understanding of the long-term trajectory of COVID-19 in India.

Indexed as

COVID-19Bayes TheoremCommunicable Disease ControlHumansIndiaPandemics

Identifiers

PMID36279288
PMCPMC9632871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.