Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36279204›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2022

Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Rates With Subsequent Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence at US Veterans Health Administration Facilities.

Alex K Bryant, Kyung Min Lee, Patrick R Alba, James D Murphy, Maria Elena Martinez, Loki Natarajan, Michael D Green, Robert T Dess, Tori R Anglin-Foote, Brian Robison and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of PSMA PET Staging on Initial Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alex K BryantDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Kyung Min LeeVA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Patrick R AlbaVA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
James D MurphyVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.
Maria Elena MartinezMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Loki NatarajanMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Michael D GreenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Robert T DessDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Tori R Anglin-FooteVA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Brian RobisonVA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Scott L DuVallVA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Julie A LynchVA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Brent S RoseVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.
VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Utah · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is controversy about the benefit of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Prostate-specific antigen screening rates have decreased since 2008 in the US, and the incidence of metastatic prostate cancer has increased. However, there is no direct epidemiologic evidence of a correlation between population PSA screening rates and subsequent metastatic prostate cancer rates. Objective: To assess whether facility-level variation in PSA screening rates is associated with subsequent facility-level metastatic prostate cancer incidence. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort used data for all men aged 40 years or older with an encounter at 128 facilities in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2019. Exposures: Yearly facility-level PSA screening rates, defined as the proportion of men aged 40 years or older with a PSA test in each year, and long-term nonscreening rates, defined as the proportion of men aged 40 years or older without a PSA test in the prior 3 years, from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2014. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were facility-level yearly counts of incident metastatic prostate cancer diagnoses and age-adjusted yearly metastatic prostate cancer incidence rates (per 100 000 men) 5 years after each PSA screening exposure year. Results: The cohort included 4 678 412 men in 2005 and 5 371 701 men in 2019. Prostate-specific antigen screening rates decreased from 47.2% in 2005 to 37.0% in 2019, and metastatic prostate cancer incidence increased from 5.2 per 100 000 men in 2005 to 7.9 per 100 000 men in 2019. Higher facility-level PSA screening rates were associated with lower metastatic prostate cancer incidence 5 years later (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.91 per 10% increase in PSA screening rate; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96; P < .001). Higher long-term nonscreening rates were associated with higher metastatic prostate cancer incidence 5 years later (IRR, 1.11 per 10% increase in long-term nonscreening rate; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: From 2005 to 2019, PSA screening rates decreased in the national VHA system. Facilities with higher PSA screening rates had lower subsequent rates of metastatic prostate cancer. These data may be used to inform shared decision-making about the potential benefits of PSA screening among men who wish to reduce their risk of metastatic prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansIncidenceMaleMass ScreeningRetrospective StudiesVeterans HealthProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36279204
PMCPMC9593319
OpenAlexW4307178543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.