Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36279135›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Comparison of Germline Genetic Testing Before and After a Medical Policy Covering Universal Testing Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

Chad Moretz, Stacey DaCosta Byfield, Kathryn E Hatchell, Joline Dalton, Peter Nicholas Onglao, Lillian Hang, Pamela Hansen, Cristi Radford, Sarah M Nielsen, Brandie Heald and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chad MoretzInvitae, San Francisco, California.
Stacey DaCosta ByfieldOptum Labs, Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Kathryn E HatchellInvitae, San Francisco, California.
Joline DaltonOptum Labs, Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Peter Nicholas OnglaoOptum Labs, Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Lillian HangOptum Labs, Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Pamela HansenOptum Labs, Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Cristi RadfordUnitedHealthcare, Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Sarah M NielsenInvitae, San Francisco, California.
Brandie HealdInvitae, San Francisco, California.
Sandra B MunroInvitae, San Francisco, California.
Robert L NussbaumInvitae, San Francisco, California.
Edward D EsplinInvitae, San Francisco, California.
Invitae (United States) · USOptum (United States) · USUnitedHealth Group (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In 2020, some health insurance plans updated their medical policy to cover germline genetic testing for all patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). Guidelines for universal tumor screening via microsatellite instability and/or immunohistochemistry (MSI/IHC) for mismatch repair protein expression for patients with CRC have been in place since 2009. Objectives: To examine whether uptake of MSI/IHC screening and germline genetic testing in patients with CRC has improved under these policies and to identify actionable findings and management implications for patients referred for germline genetic testing. Design, Setting, and Participants: The multicenter, retrospective cohort study comprised 2 analyses of patients 18 years or older who were diagnosed with CRC between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. The first analysis used an insurance claims data set to examine use of MSI/IHC screening and germline genetic testing for patients diagnosed with CRC between 2017 and 2020 and treated with systemic therapy. The second comprised patients with CRC who had germline genetic testing performed in 2020 that was billed under a universal testing policy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient demographic characteristics, clinical information, and use of MSI/IHC screening and germline genetic testing were analyzed. Results: For 9066 patients with newly diagnosed CRC (mean [SD] age, 64.2 [12.7] years; 4964 [54.8%] male), administrative claims data indicated that MSI/IHC was performed in 6645 eligible patients (73.3%) during the study period, with 2288 (25.2%) not receiving MSI/IHC despite being eligible for coverage. Analysis of a second cohort of 55 595 patients with CRC diagnosed in 2020 and covered by insurance found that only 1675 (3.0%) received germline genetic testing. In a subset of patients for whom germline genetic testing results were available, 1 in 6 patients had pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, with most of these patients having variants with established clinical actionability. Conclusions and Relevance: This nationwide cohort study found suboptimal rates of MSI/IHC screening and germline genetic testing uptake, resulting in clinically actionable genetic data being unavailable to patients diagnosed with CRC, despite universal eligibility. Effective strategies are required to address barriers to implementation of evidence-based universal testing policies that support precision treatment and optimal care management for patients with CRC.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisCohort StudiesFemaleGenetic TestingGerm CellsHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedPolicyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36279135
PMCPMC9593236
OpenAlexW4307190161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.