Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36279038›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2022

Current practice on the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy in Italy: the Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADiGe) survey.

Valentina Mengardo, Jacopo Weindelmayer, Alessandro Veltri, Simone Giacopuzzi, Lorena Torroni, Giovanni de Manzoni, Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group (GIRCG), the Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons (SPIGC)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valentina MengardoGeneral and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Jacopo WeindelmayerGeneral and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. j.weindelmayer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9859-6038
Alessandro VeltriGeneral and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Simone GiacopuzziGeneral and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Lorena TorroniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni de ManzoniGeneral and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group (GIRCG), the Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons (SPIGC)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence against the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy are increasing and ERAS guidelines suggest the benefit of drain avoidance. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether this practice is still widespread. We conducted a survey among Italian surgeons through the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group and the Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons, aiming to understand the current use of prophylactic drain. A 28-item questionnaire-based survey was developed to analyze the current practice and the individual opinion about the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy. Groups based on age, experience and unit volume were separately analyzed. Response of 104 surgeons from 73 surgical units were collected. A standardized ERAS protocol for gastrectomy was applied by 42% of the respondents. Most of the surgeons, regardless of age, experience, or unit volume, declared to routinely place one or more drain after gastrectomy. Only 2 (1.9%) and 7 surgeons (6.7%) belonging to high volume units, do not routinely place drains after total and subtotal gastrectomy, respectively. More than 60% of the participants remove the drain on postoperative day 4-6 after performing an assessment of the anastomosis integrity. Interestingly, less than half of the surgeons believe that drain is the main tool for leak management, and this percentage further drops among younger surgeons. On the other hand, drain's role seems to be more defined for duodenal stump leak treatment, with almost 50% of the surgeons recognizing its importance. Routine use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy is still a widespread practice even if younger surgeons are more persuaded that it could not be advantageous.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsSurgeonsDrainageGastrectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsSurveys and QuestionnairesDrainDrainageGastrectomyGastric cancerSurvey

Identifiers

PMID36279038
PMCPMC9674733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.