ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022
[Practical use of electronic patient records: findings from two care projects in centers for rare diseases].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An electronic patient record offers opportunities for digital networks between medical care providers and for the digital communication between health service providers and their patients. Patients with rare diseases benefit from a diagnosis and treatment information at an early stage and receive precise treatment on the basis of multiprofessional case management. Regarding the patient care and medical research in rare diseases, electronic patient records can help to collect all data in a structured manner and to digitally map the workflows in registration, admission, diagnosis, and treatment. This can reduce costs in our healthcare system, as diagnosis and treatment can be targeted better at the patients and unnecessary medical examinations can be reduced.In two pilot projects, first experiences with electronic patient records for patients with rare diseases were gathered. In cooperation with several medical care providers, the projects BASE-Netz and TRANSLATE-NAMSE analyzed the requirements of an electronic patient record, demonstrated the technical and legal feasibility, and evaluated the practicability for medical care providers and patients. The participating centers for rare diseases see benefits in the structured registration of the patients and the simplification of cross-institutional patient management, as patients can fulfil more tasks on their own and the health professionals can easily share data. The development of the Telematikinfrastructure of the Gematik offers opportunities to ease the digital connection between doctors' offices and the center for rare diseases. In particular, constant clarification and transparency are essential in order to provide information on data protection issues. Training and support should also be provided to promote patients' digital skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.