Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36278742›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2022

Beyond Mechanical Tension: A Review of Resistance Exercise-Induced Lactate Responses & Muscle Hypertrophy.

Daniel Lawson, Christopher Vann, Brad J Schoenfeld, Cody Haun

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Special Issue "Applied Sport Physiology and Performance-3rd Edition".Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Lactate as a myokine and exerkine: drivers and signals of physiology and metabolism.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel LawsonSchool of Kinesiology, Applied Health and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Christopher VannDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-4488
Brad J SchoenfeldDepartment of Exercise Science and Recreation, Lehman College of CUNY, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.
Cody HaunFitomics, LLC, Alabaster, AL 35007, USA.
Duke University · USLehman College · USOklahoma State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review aims to explore and discuss recent research relating to the lactate response to resistance training and the potential mechanisms by which lactate may contribute to skeletal muscle hypertrophy or help to prevent muscle atrophy. First, we will discuss foundational information pertaining to lactate including metabolism, measurement, shuttling, and potential (although seemingly elusive) mechanisms for hypertrophy. We will then provide a brief analysis of resistance training protocols and the associated lactate response. Lastly, we will discuss potential shortcomings, resistance training considerations, and future research directions regarding lactate's role as a potential anabolic agent for skeletal muscle hypertrophy.

Indexed as

lactatemuscle hypertrophyresistance exerciseresistance training

Identifiers

PMID36278742
PMCPMC9590033
OpenAlexW4303712339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.