Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36278739›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2022

Impact of Distance and Proficiency on Shooting Kinematics in Professional Male Basketball Players.

Dimitrije Cabarkapa, Damjana V Cabarkapa, Nicolas M Philipp, Drake A Eserhaut, Gabriel G Downey, Andrew C Fry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Special Issue "Applied Sport Physiology and Performance-3rd Edition".Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimitrije CabarkapaJayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9912-3251
Damjana V CabarkapaJayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4680-0313
Nicolas M PhilippJayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Drake A EserhautJayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Gabriel G DowneyJayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Andrew C FryJayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory-Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8171-7684
University of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shooting efficiency is one of the key performance parameters related to securing the desired game outcome at various levels of basketball competition, and it is largely influenced by the biomechanical adjustments incorporated during the preparatory and release phase of the shooting motion. Thus, the purpose of the present study was twofold: (a) to examine the differences in the kinematic characteristics between free-throw, two-point, and three-point shots, and (b) to examine the differences between shooters with excellent (≥80%) and good (<80%) levels of shooting proficiency. A total of 10 professional male basketball players performed 5 free-throw (4.57 m), two-point (5.18 m), and three-point (6.75 m) shots, combining for a total of 150 shots. A high-definition camera recording at 120 fps was used to capture the shooting motion from a sagittal point of view, and video analysis software was used to analyze the kinematic variables of interest. The findings of the present study reveal that the kinematic characteristics during the preparatory phase of the shooting motion remain unchanged between free-throw and two-point shots. Three-point shots required lower elbow positioning, influenced by greater knee and hip flexion when compared to free-throw and two-point shots. The release angle was notably lower for shots attempted beyond the three-point line but remained unchanged between the free-throw and two-point shooting motions. Release height and vertical displacement were significantly greater for two- and three-point shots when compared to free-throw shots, while no difference was observed between the two- and three-point shots. In addition, no significant differences in shooting kinematics were observed between those participants with excellent and good levels of shooting proficiency.

Indexed as

biomechanicscoachingfree-throwperformancesportthree-pointtwo-point

Identifiers

PMID36278739
PMCPMC9590067
OpenAlexW4303712172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.