ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2022
Impact of Distance and Proficiency on Shooting Kinematics in Professional Male Basketball Players.
Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Virtual reality-assisted neuromuscular training effects on agility performance and injury prevention in basketball athletes: a controlled laboratory experiment.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Decoding free-throw accuracy: a 2D biomechanical comparison of shooting mechanics in athletes and novice basketball players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Article
- Biomechanical determinants of proficient 3-point shooters: markerless motion capture analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Special Issue "Applied Sport Physiology and Performance-3rd Edition".Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Lower-limb coordination adaptations to shooting distance in basketball: an exploratory angular velocity-based vector coding study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Kinematic Differences Based on Shooting Proficiency and Distance in Female Basketball Players.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023Article
- Differentiating attack-defense performance for starting and bench players during the Tokyo Olympics men's basketball competition.PloS one · 2023Article
- Biomechanical characteristics of proficient free-throw shooters-markerless motion capture analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Acute influence of resistance exercise on basketball shooting mechanics and accuracy.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Performance factors that negatively influence shooting efficiency in women's basketball.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shooting efficiency is one of the key performance parameters related to securing the desired game outcome at various levels of basketball competition, and it is largely influenced by the biomechanical adjustments incorporated during the preparatory and release phase of the shooting motion. Thus, the purpose of the present study was twofold: (a) to examine the differences in the kinematic characteristics between free-throw, two-point, and three-point shots, and (b) to examine the differences between shooters with excellent (≥80%) and good (<80%) levels of shooting proficiency. A total of 10 professional male basketball players performed 5 free-throw (4.57 m), two-point (5.18 m), and three-point (6.75 m) shots, combining for a total of 150 shots. A high-definition camera recording at 120 fps was used to capture the shooting motion from a sagittal point of view, and video analysis software was used to analyze the kinematic variables of interest. The findings of the present study reveal that the kinematic characteristics during the preparatory phase of the shooting motion remain unchanged between free-throw and two-point shots. Three-point shots required lower elbow positioning, influenced by greater knee and hip flexion when compared to free-throw and two-point shots. The release angle was notably lower for shots attempted beyond the three-point line but remained unchanged between the free-throw and two-point shooting motions. Release height and vertical displacement were significantly greater for two- and three-point shots when compared to free-throw shots, while no difference was observed between the two- and three-point shots. In addition, no significant differences in shooting kinematics were observed between those participants with excellent and good levels of shooting proficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.