ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Current Concepts and Methods in Tissue Interface Scaffold Fabrication.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topographical design principles for osteochondral tissue engineering.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- From bone replacement to regeneration. A biomaterials started journey.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Green and Scalable Manufacturing of Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds: Solvent-Free Processing, Supercritical COPolymers · 2026Review
- Advancing the 3Rs in bone tissue engineering: emergingFrontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Silk cryogel and electrospun scaffold characterization for bone-tendon interface applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- The Concept of the Optimal Bioscaffold: Parameters, Problems, and Their Resolution Through Additive Manufacturing.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Smart and Biodegradable Polymers in Tissue Engineering and Interventional Devices: A Brief Review.Polymers · 2025Review
- Tissue Regeneration of Radiation-Induced Skin Damages Using Protein/Polysaccharide-Based Bioengineered Scaffolds and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Design of Chitin Cell Culture Matrices for 3D Tissue Engineering: The Importance of Chitin Types, Solvents, Cross-Linkers, and Fabrication Techniques.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Optimization of Polycaprolactone and Type I Collagen Scaffold for Tendon Tissue Regeneration.Cureus · 2024Article
- Additive and Lithographic Manufacturing of Biomedical Scaffold Structures Using a Versatile Thiol-Ene Photocurable Resin.Polymers · 2024Article
- Development of Bioactive Scaffolds for Orthopedic Applications by Designing Additively Manufactured Titanium Porous Structures: A Critical Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- Biomimetic Bilayered Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: From Current Design Strategies to Medical Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Review
- Adjustment of Micro- and Macroporosity of ß-TCP Scaffolds Using Solid-Stabilized Foams as Bone Replacement.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Cross Talk Between Cells and the Current Bioceramics in Bone Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Damage caused by disease or trauma often leads to multi-tissue damage which is both painful and expensive for the patient. Despite the common occurrence of such injuries, reconstruction can be incredibly challenging and often may focus on a single tissue, which has been damaged to a greater extent, rather than the environment as a whole. Tissue engineering offers an approach to encourage repair, replacement, and regeneration using scaffolds, biomaterials and bioactive factors. However, there are many advantages to creating a combined scaffold fabrication method approach that incorporates the treatment and regeneration of multiple tissue types simultaneously. This review provides a guide to combining multiple tissue-engineered scaffold fabrication methods to span several tissue types concurrently. Briefly, a background in the healing and composition of typical tissues targeted in scaffold fabrication is provided. Then, common tissue-engineered scaffold fabrication methods are highlighted, specifically focusing on porosity, mechanical integrity, and practicality for clinical application. Finally, an overview of commonly used scaffold biomaterials and additives is provided, and current research in combining multiple scaffold fabrication techniques is discussed. Overall, this review will serve to bridge the critical gap in knowledge pertaining to combining different fabrication methods for tissue regeneration without disrupting structural integrity and biomaterial properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.