Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36278663›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2022

CBCT Evaluation of Sticky Bone in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with and without Collagen Membrane-A Randomized Parallel Arm Clinical Trial.

Jane Belinda Tony, Harinath Parthasarathy, Anupama Tadepalli, Deepa Ponnaiyan, Ahmed Alamoudi, Mona Awad Kamil, Khalid J Alzahrani, Khalaf F Alsharif, Ibrahim F Halawani, Mrim M Alnfiai and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07210385 (Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment of Anterior Horizontal Maxillary Bone Augmentation Using Autogenous and Bovine Sticky Bone Versus Autogenous and Bovine Bone Shell Technique), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07210385 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment of Anterior Horizontal Maxillary Bone Augmentation Using Autogenous and Bovine Sticky Bone Versus Autogenous and Bovine Bone Shell Technique (Khoury): A Randomized Comparative Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsMaxillary Augmentation in Horizontal Bone DefectArmsanterior horizontal maxillary bone augmentation using autogenous and bovine sticky bone, anterior horizontal maxillary bone augmentation using autogenous and bovine bone shell technique (khoury)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Histological Analysis of Sticky Tooth and Sticky Bone.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Sticky Bone: Advances and Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jane Belinda TonyDepartment of Periodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai 600089, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1064-6000
Harinath ParthasarathyDepartment of Periodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai 600089, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7869-3586
Anupama TadepalliDepartment of Periodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai 600089, India.
Deepa PonnaiyanDepartment of Periodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai 600089, India.
Ahmed AlamoudiOral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22254, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7459-5324
Mona Awad KamilDepartment of Preventive Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid J AlzahraniDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6688-0106
Khalaf F AlsharifDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8156-2069
Ibrahim F HalawaniDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6632-0646
Mrim M AlnfiaiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Lakshmi RamachandranDepartment of Periodontics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai 600089, India.
Thodur Madapusi BalajiTagore Medical and Dental College, Rathinamangalam, Vandalur, Chennai 600127, India.
Shankargouda PatilCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-5497
SRM Dental College · INTaif University · SAJazan University · SAKing Abdulaziz University · SARagas Dental College & Hospital · INRoseman University of Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a reliable technique used to treat ridge deficiencies prior or during implant placement. Injectable-platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF) laced with a bone substitute (sticky bone) has heralded the way for advancing the outcomes of bone regeneration. This study evaluated the efficacy of sticky bone in horizontal ridge augmentation with and without collagen membrane. A total of 20 partially edentulous patients (Group-I n = 10; Group-II n = 10) that indicated GBR were included, and the surgical procedure was carried out. In Group-I, the sticky bone and collagen membrane were placed in ridge-deficient sites and Group-II received only sticky bone. At the end of 6 months, 20 patients (Group-I (n = 10); Group-II (n = 10)) completed the follow-up period. A CBCT examination was performed to assess changes in the horizontal ridge width (HRW) and vertical bone height (VBH). A statistically significant increase in HRW (p < 0.05) was observed in both groups with mean gains of 1.35 mm, 1.55 mm, and 1.93 mm at three levels (crest, 3 mm, and 6 mm) in Group-I and 2.7 mm, 2.8 mm, and 2.6 mm at three levels in Group-II. The intergroup comparison revealed statistical significance (p < 0.05) with respect to HRW and KTW (Keratinised tissue width) gains of 0.775 at the 6-month follow-up. Sticky-bone (Xenogenic-bone graft + i-PRF) served as a promising biomaterial in achieving better horizontal bone width gain.

Indexed as

collagen membraneguided bone regeneration horizontal ridge augmentationinjectable-platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF)sticky bone

Identifiers

PMID36278663
PMCPMC9590014
OpenAlexW4306835855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.