ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2022
Smart Bacteria-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems in Medical Implants.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanoparticle-Enabled Biomaterials for Controlled Drug Delivery in Implantable and Wearable Devices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Biofilm Pathogenesis, Immune Dysregulation, and Emerging Prosthetic Interface Strategies.Biology · 2026Review
- Bioinspired and living multiscale composites for regenerative medicine in the treatment of surgical site infections.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- From Sea to Therapy: Marine Biomaterials for Drug Delivery and Wound Healing.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Recent Progress in Multifunctional Stimuli-Responsive Combinational Drug Delivery Systems for the Treatment of Biofilm-Forming Bacterial Infections.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- What is the role of microbial biotechnology and genetic engineering in medicine?MicrobiologyOpen · 2024Review
- Review
- pH-Responsive Cobalt(II)-Coordinated Assembly Containing Quercetin for Antimicrobial Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advanced Procedure of Simultaneous Electrodeposition from a Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent of a Drug and a Polymer Used to Improve TiZr Alloy Behavior.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Recent Advancements in Metallic Drug-Eluting Implants.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Recent advances of cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for therapy of bacterial infection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of implantable biomaterials, the rising risk of bacterial infections has drawn widespread concern. Due to the high recurrence rate of bacterial infections and the issue of antibiotic resistance, the common treatments of peri-implant infections cannot meet the demand. In this context, stimuli-responsive biomaterials have attracted attention because of their great potential to spontaneously modulate the drug releasing rate. Numerous smart bacteria-responsive drug delivery systems (DDSs) have, therefore, been designed to temporally and spatially release antibacterial agents from the implants in an autonomous manner at the infected sites. In this review, we summarized recent advances in bacteria-responsive DDSs used for combating bacterial infections, mainly according to the different trigger modes, including physical stimuli-responsive, virulence-factor-responsive, host-immune-response responsive and their combinations. It is believed that the smart bacteria-responsive DDSs will become the next generation of mainstream antibacterial therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.