ReviewBiotech (Basel (Switzerland))2022
Biotechnological Interventions in Tomato (
Review in Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond osmoprotection: the expanding roles of proline in plant signalling and development.Biologia futura · 2026Review
- The SlASR4 Interaction with the Phloem Protein2 (SlPP2) regulating the tolerance to drought in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Synergistic rhizobacteria enhance physio-biochemical resilience and sustain tomato yield under drought stress.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrative Exploration ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Biotechnological modification of the cytokinin regulatory system to improve drought and heat tolerance in the major crops.Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- Temporal transcriptome and WGCNA analysis unveils divergent drought response strategies in wild and cultivatedFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Endophytic Colonization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Impact of Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganism (PGPM) Consortium on Biochemical Properties and Yields of Tomato Under Drought Stress.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deleterious Effects of Heat Stress on the Tomato, Its Innate Responses, and Potential Preventive Strategies in the Realm of Emerging Technologies.Metabolites · 2024Review
- Advanced Biotechnological Interventions in Mitigating Drought Stress in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Impact ofPeerJ · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Evolutionary Characterization and Expression Analysis of Major Latex Protein (MLP) Family Genes in Tomato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Physiology and Gene Expression Analysis of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Exposed to Combined-Virus and Drought Stresses.The plant pathology journal · 2023Article
- Seed Priming with the Selenium Nanoparticles Maintains the Redox Status in the Water Stressed Tomato Plants by Modulating the Antioxidant Defense Enzymes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Enhanced Affinity of WRKY Reinforces Drought Tolerance inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Crop Wild Relatives: A Valuable Source of Tolerance to Various Abiotic Stresses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tomato production is severely affected by abiotic stresses (drought, flood, heat, and salt) and causes approximately 70% loss in yield depending on severity and duration of the stress. Drought is the most destructive abiotic stress and tomato is very sensitive to the drought stress, as cultivated tomato lack novel gene(s) for drought stress tolerance. Only 20% of agricultural land worldwide is irrigated, and only 14.51% of that is well-irrigated, while the rest is rain fed. This scenario makes drought very frequent, which restricts the genetically predetermined yield. Primarily, drought disturbs tomato plant physiology by altering plant-water relation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. Many wild tomato species have drought tolerance gene(s); however, their exploitation is very difficult because of high genetic distance and pre- and post-transcriptional barriers for embryo development. To overcome these issues, biotechnological methods, including transgenic technology and CRISPR-Cas, are used to enhance drought tolerance in tomato. Transgenic technology permitted the exploitation of non-host gene/s. On the other hand, CRISPR-Cas9 technology facilitated the editing of host tomato gene(s) for drought stress tolerance. The present review provides updated information on biotechnological intervention in tomato for drought stress management and sustainable agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.