Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36278356›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022

Amyloid PET: A Questionable Single Primary Surrogate Efficacy Measure on Alzheimer Immunotherapy Trials.

Poul F Høilund-Carlsen, Mona-Elisabeth Revheim, Abass Alavi, Nagichettiar Satyamurthy, Jorge R Barrio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Analysis of the off-target interaction of amyloid PET tracers with human brain sulfotransferases.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Poul F Høilund-CarlsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Mona-Elisabeth RevheimDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Abass AlaviDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nagichettiar SatyamurthyDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jorge R BarrioDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using amyloid PET imaging as a single primary surrogate efficacy measure in Alzheimer's disease immunotherapy trials, as happened when the FDA granted accelerated approval of aducanumab, is unjustified. In vivo evidence indicates that PET quantification of amyloid deposition is distorted and misrepresents effects of anti-amyloid treatments due to lack of specificity of the PET imaging probe, effects of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, spill-over from high white matter signals, and questionable quantification models. Before granting approval to other immunotherapy candidates, the FDA should require rigorous evidence of all imaging claims and irrefutable documentation that proposed treatments are clinically effective and harmless to patients.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloidogenic ProteinsHumansImmunotherapyPositron-Emission TomographyAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloidogenic ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseamyloid PETamyloid-βARIAimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36278356
PMCPMC9789473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.