Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36278354›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022

Disclosing Individual Results in Dementia Research: A Proposed Study Participant's Bill of Rights.

Sarah Walter, Angela Taylor, Jamie Tyrone, Sara Langer, John-Richard Pagan, Cynthia Huling Hummel, Bonnie M Wheaton, Doris T Zallen, Allyson C Rosen

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Return of research results across the Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers network.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Public and participant involvement as a pathway to inclusive dementia research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  11. The Consortium for Clarity in ADRD Research Through Imaging (CLARiTI).Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. National Institute on Aging's 50th Anniversary: Advancing Cognitive Aging Research and the Cognitive Health of Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Communicating and Using Dementia Risk Evidence.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah WalterAlzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Angela TaylorLewy Body Dementia Association, Lilburn, GA, USA.
Jamie TyroneAdvisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia Stakeholder and Patient Sub-Committee.
Sara LangerAdvisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia Stakeholder and Patient Sub-Committee.
John-Richard PaganAdvisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia Stakeholder and Patient Sub-Committee.
Cynthia Huling HummelAdvisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia Stakeholder and Patient Sub-Committee.
Bonnie M WheatonAdvisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia Stakeholder and Patient Sub-Committee.
Doris T ZallenVirginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Allyson C RosenPalo Alto VAMC, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

Targeting Functional Improvement in rTMS TherapyI01RX003152 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI ROSEN, ALLYSON C · 2019 to 2024
–
RRD VA I01 RX003152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Study Participant's Bill of Rights is a call to action for researchers in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) to proactively design clinical studies that provide the option for research participants to learn their individual research results if they choose, and in a manner that ensures study integrity. This Bill of Rights was crafted by a committee of study participants, care partners, representatives of dementia advocacy organizations, and other stakeholders in dementia research for the Advisory Group on Risk Education for Dementia (AGREEDementia). The framework developed by the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials (MRCT) Return of Individual Research Results provides a useful context for researchers to plan their studies and disclosure.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDisclosureHumansBiomarkerscommunicationdementiadisclosureethicsgeneticspatient rights

Identifiers

PMID36278354
PMCPMC10120612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.