Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36278238›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Estimating provisional margins of exposure for data-poor chemicals using high-throughput computational methods.

Chantel I Nicolas, Matthew W Linakis, Melyssa S Minto, Kamel Mansouri, Rebecca A Clewell, Miyoung Yoon, John F Wambaugh, Grace Patlewicz, Patrick D McMullen, Melvin E Andersen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chantel I NicolasOffice of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, US EPA, Washington, DC, United States.
Matthew W LinakisRamboll, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Melyssa S MintoScitoVation, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Kamel MansouriNational Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Rebecca A Clewell21st Century Tox Consulting Chapel Hill, Washington, NC, United States.
Miyoung YoonScitoVation, Raleigh, NC, United States.
John F WambaughCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure Office of Research and Development, US EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Grace PatlewiczCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure Office of Research and Development, US EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Patrick D McMullenScitoVation, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Melvin E AndersenScitoVation, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Harvey J Clewell IiiRamboll, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current computational technologies hold promise for prioritizing the testing of the thousands of chemicals in commerce. Here, a case study is presented demonstrating comparative risk-prioritization approaches based on the ratio of surrogate hazard and exposure data, called margins of exposure (MoEs). Exposures were estimated using a U.S. EPA's ExpoCast predictive model (SEEM3) results and estimates of bioactivity were predicted using: 1) Oral equivalent doses (OEDs) derived from U.S. EPA's ToxCast high-throughput screening program, together with

Indexed as

computational toxicologyhigh-throughput risk prioritizationin silicomargin of exposure (MoE)Threshold of toxicological concern (TTC)

Identifiers

PMID36278238
PMCPMC9586287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.