ArticleHeliyon2022
Diagnostic evaluation of nCoV-QS, nCoV-QM-N, and nCoV-OM detection kits based on rRT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Ecuador.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- The quality of commercial SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests in Ecuador: lessons from COVID-19 pandemic for advancing social equity through microbiology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ecuador was harshly impacted by COVID-19, in the region was the epicenter of the pandemic with the highest mortality rates and with the lowest rates of processed samples. Real-time reverse transcription PCR assays are essential to identify and manage the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Because of the global emergency, in Ecuador several commercial kits were introduced for use without clinical validation. In this manner, having the need to perform an evaluation with clinical samples before use for population screening. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the nCoV-QS, nCoV-QM-N, nCoV-OM detection kits lately available in Ecuador, against the LightMix Materials and methods: 198 nasopharyngeal samples were used (66 fresh NPS and 132 RNA stored samples). All samples were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 with nCoV-QS, nCoV-QM-N, nCoV-OM detection kits and compared the concordance (Cohen's Kappa index, positive percentage agreement and negative percentage agreement) to LightMix Results: The 198 samples presented strong concordance (96% nCoV-QM-N, 100% nCoV-OM and 100% nCoV-QS). The individual performance of each gene showed that the nCoV-OM kit had a higher number of samples detected with the Conclusion: The nCoV-QS, nCoV-QM-N, and nCoV-OM Detection kits have comparable diagnostic performance to the emergency approved LightMix
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.