ArticleACS omega2022
Insight into the Process and Mechanism of Water-Rock Interaction in Underground Coal Mine Reservoirs Based on Indoor Static Simulation Experiments.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Water pressure effect and influence mechanism of coal mechanical property degradation under mine water immersion conditions.PloS one · 2025Article
- Water-Rock Interaction Mechanisms and Hydrochemical Evolution in the Underground Reservoirs of Coal Mines.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Experimental study on the influence of water-rock interaction on the time-varying characteristics of coal rock mass.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2024Article
- Advances in the Experiments of Leaching in Cement-Based Materials and Dissolution in Rocks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Mechanism of Changes in Goaf Water Hydrogeochemistry: A Case Study of the Menkeqing Coal Mine.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the storage of underground water reservoirs in coal mines, water-rock interaction occurred between mine water and collapsed rocks, resulting in improved mine water quality, but the water-rock process and mechanism have not been clarified. In this study, six sets of simulated experiments were designed to investigate the water-rock interaction between two types of roof collapse rocks and different water samples in the Daliuta coal mine. The ion ratio method and multivariate statistics are used to reveal the process and mechanism of water-rock interaction during the experimental process from the perspective of input and output water chemical characteristics and rock properties, respectively. The results show that the ion concentration of the effluent water is controlled by water-rock interaction, and the water-rock process mainly involves the dissolution of halite, silicate, pyrite, calcite, dolomite, magnesia chlorite, and gypsum precipitation and is accompanied by ion exchange. Mineral dissolution and precipitation are the most important factors affecting the ion abundance in the effluent. There are differences in the reaction rate, degree of reaction, and dissolution process during the experimental process of fine sandstone and mudstone. Fine sandstone is more reactive than mudstone in terms of reaction rate and degree of reaction, and fine sandstone is dissolved from surface pores to inside and around, while mudstone is generated in new dissolved pores. We found that rock type, ion concentration in the input water, and rock reaction period influence the water-rock interaction during the experiment. The results provide a reference for clarifying the water-rock interaction during the storage of underground water reservoirs in coal mines and predicting the water quality of the effluent.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.