ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2022
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Gilbert syndrome: exploring the heterozygous UGT1A1 c.41_40dup variant as a potential modifier of bile composition associated with a cholangiopathic phenotype in adults with unexplained chronic cholestasis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of genetic cholestasis in adults.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Review
- Primary intrahepatic lithiasis in western countries: role of ultrasound and comparison with MRI with MRCP.European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Article
- Genotypes and different clinical variants between children and adults in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a state-of-the-art review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Review
- Genetics of Gallstone Disease and Their Clinical Significance: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2024Review
- A Unique In Vitro Assay to Investigate ABCB4 Transport Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: The low-phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis (LPAC) syndrome is a recently described peculiar form of cholelithiasis associated with the ATP-binding-cassette subfamily B, member 4 ( Methods: A total of 233 individuals with proven LPAC syndrome were enrolled between January 2003 and June 2018 in a retrospective single-centre study. Inclusion criteria included availability of clinical files, MR images, and genetic data. MR images were analysed by consensus among 3 senior radiologists blinded to the status of Results: A total of 125 individuals (mean age at first MR imaging 40.8 years; 66% females; 48% Conclusions: Lay summary:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.