Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277824›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2022

Linking scientific instruments and computation: Patterns, technologies, and experiences.

Rafael Vescovi, Ryan Chard, Nickolaus D Saint, Ben Blaiszik, Jim Pruyne, Tekin Bicer, Alex Lavens, Zhengchun Liu, Michael E Papka, Suresh Narayanan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rafael VescoviData Science and Learning Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Ryan ChardData Science and Learning Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Nickolaus D SaintGlobus, University of Chicago, 5730 S. Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60615, USA.
Ben BlaiszikData Science and Learning Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Jim PruyneData Science and Learning Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Tekin BicerData Science and Learning Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Alex LavensStructural Biology Center, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Zhengchun LiuData Science and Learning Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Michael E PapkaArgonne Leadership Computing Facility, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Suresh NarayananX-ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Nicholas SchwarzX-ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Kyle ChardData Science and Learning Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Ian T FosterData Science and Learning Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Lemont, IL 60439, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Powerful detectors at modern experimental facilities routinely collect data at multiple GB/s. Online analysis methods are needed to enable the collection of only interesting subsets of such massive data streams, such as by explicitly discarding some data elements or by directing instruments to relevant areas of experimental space. Thus, methods are required for configuring and running distributed computing pipelines-what we call flows-that link instruments, computers (e.g., for analysis, simulation, artificial intelligence [AI] model training), edge computing (e.g., for analysis), data stores, metadata catalogs, and high-speed networks. We review common patterns associated with such flows and describe methods for instantiating these patterns. We present experiences with the application of these methods to the processing of data from five different scientific instruments, each of which engages powerful computers for data inversion,model training, or other purposes. We also discuss implications of such methods for operators and users of scientific facilities.

Indexed as

big datacomputing fabricdata fabricExperiment automationGlobusmachine learningscientific facilitysynchrotron light sourcetrust fabricworkflow

Identifiers

PMID36277824
PMCPMC9583115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.