ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Development of a complete blood count with differential-based prediction model for in-hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction in the coronary care unit.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A fine-grained transformer combined with multimodal data for predicting hospital length of stay in acute coronary syndrome.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association of omega-3 fatty acids with improved prognosis after myocardial infarction: the role of red cell distribution width-an EHR study.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Comparing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mortality after Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In recent years, the complete blood count with differential (CBC w/diff) test has drawn strong interest because of its prognostic value in cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to develop a CBC w/diff-based prediction model for in-hospital mortality among patients with severe acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the coronary care unit (CCU). Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective study used data from a public database. The neural network method was applied. The performance of the model was assessed by discrimination and calibration. The discrimination performance of our model was compared to that of seven other classical machine learning models and five well-studied CBC w/diff clinical indicators. Finally, a permutation test was applied to evaluate the importance rank of the predictor variables. Results: A total of 2,231 patient medical records were included. With a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.788 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.736-0.838], our model outperformed all other models and indices. Furthermore, it performed well in calibration. Finally, the top three predictors were white blood cell count (WBC), red blood cell distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV), and neutrophil percentage. Surprisingly, after dropping seven variables with poor prediction values, the AUC of our model increased to 0.812 (95% CI, 0.762-0.859) ( Conclusion: We used a neural network method to develop a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality among patients with AMI in the CCU based on the CBC w/diff test, which performed well and would aid in early clinical decision-making. The top three important predictors were WBC, RDW-CV and neutrophil percentage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.