Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277775›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Machine learning derived ECG risk score improves cardiovascular risk assessment in conjunction with coronary artery calcium scoring.

Shruti Siva Kumar, Sadeer Al-Kindi, Nour Tashtish, Varun Rajagopalan, Pingfu Fu, Sanjay Rajagopalan, Anant Madabhushi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075162 (Community Benefit of No-charge Calcium Score Screening Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04075162 recruitingnot on this map

Community Benefit of No-charge Calcium Score Screening Program

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterRan2014 to 2030Enrolled77,000ConditionsCardiovascular Risk Factor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shruti Siva KumarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Sadeer Al-KindiHarrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Nour TashtishHarrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Varun RajagopalanHarrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Pingfu FuDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Sanjay RajagopalanHarrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Anant MadabhushiWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics (BMI) and Pathology, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Research Health Scientist, Atlanta Veterans Administration Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Case Western Reserve University · USThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Precision estimation of cardiovascular risk remains the cornerstone of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention. While coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring is the best available non-invasive quantitative modality to evaluate risk of ASCVD, it excludes risk related to prior myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmia which are implicated in ASCVD. The high-dimensional and inter-correlated nature of ECG data makes it a good candidate for analysis using machine learning techniques and may provide additional prognostic information not captured by CAC. In this study, we aimed to develop a quantitative ECG risk score (eRiS) to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) alone, or when added to CAC. Further, we aimed to construct and validate a novel nomogram incorporating ECG, CAC and clinical factors for ASCVD. Methods: We analyzed 5,864 patients with at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor who underwent CAC scoring and a standard ECG as part of the CLARIFY study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04075162). Events were defined as myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke or death. A total of 649 ECG features, consisting of measurements such as amplitude and interval measurements from all deflections in the ECG waveform (53 per lead and 13 overall) were automatically extracted using a clinical software (GE Muse™ Cardiology Information System, GE Healthcare). The data was split into 4 training (S Findings: Over a median follow-up of 14 months, 494 patients had MACE. The feature selection strategy preserved only about 18% of the features that were consistent across the various strata (S Conclusion: The use of ECG features in conjunction with CAC may allow for improved prognostication and identification of populations at risk. Future directions will involve prospective validation of the risk score and the nomogram across diverse populations with a heterogeneity of treatment effects.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceatherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD)electrocardiogram (ECG)machine learningnomogramrisk assessment/classification

Identifiers

PMID36277775
PMCPMC9580025
OpenAlexW4301599493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.