Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277725›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed by IADPSG criteria: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Juan Juan, Yiying Sun, Yumei Wei, Shuang Wang, Geng Song, Jie Yan, Pengxiang Zhou, Huixia Yang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Factors Associated with Progression to Type 2 Diabetes among Women with Gestational Diabetes.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Fulminant and Slowly Progressive Type 1 Diabetes Associated with Pregnancy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juan JuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiying SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yumei WeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shuang WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Geng SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie YanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Pengxiang ZhouDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huixia YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To estimate the progression rates to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosed by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching Medline, Embase, and Cochrane between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2021 for observational studies investigating progression to T2DM after GDM. Inclusion criteria were IADPSG-diagnosed GDM, studies with both GDM and controls, postpartum follow-up duration at least one year. Data were pooled by random effects meta-analysis models. Heterogeneity was assessed by I Results: This meta-analysis of six studies assessed a total of 61932 individuals (21978 women with GDM and 39954 controls). Women with IADPSG-diagnosed GDM were 6.43 times (RR=6.43, 95% CI:3.45-11.96) more likely to develop T2DM in the future compared with controls. For GDM women, the cumulative incidence of T2DM was 12.1% (95% CI: 6.9%-17.3%), while the pooled cumulative incidence of T2DM was estimated to be 8% (95% CI: 5-11%) in studies with 1 to 5 years of follow-up and increased to 19% (95% CI: 3-34%) for studies with more than 5 years of follow-up. Women with IADPSG-diagnosed GDM had 3.69 times (RR=3.69, 95% CI:2.70-5.06) higher risk of developing pre-diabetes (including impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance) than controls. Meta-regression analysis showed that the study effect size was not significantly associated with study design, race, length of follow-up, and maternal age (P>0.05). Overall, the studies had a relatively low risk of bias. Conclusions: Women with IADPSG-diagnosed GDM have higher risk of developing T2DM and pre-diabetes. The risk of T2DM in GDM women are higher with longer follow-up duration. Our results highlight the importance of promoting postpartum screening and keeping health lifestyle as well as pharmacological interventions to delay/prevent the onset of T2DM/pre-diabetes in GDM women. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42022314776).

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Prediabetic StatePregnancy in DiabeticsFemaleGlucoseGlucose Tolerance TestHumansPregnancyGlucosegestational diabetes mellitusIADPSG criteriameta-analysissystematic reviewtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID36277725
PMCPMC9582268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.