Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277705›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Gestational diabetes is associated with alteration on pelvic floor muscle activation pattern during pregnancy and postpartum: Prospective cohort using electromyography assessment.

Caroline Baldini Prudencio, Sthefanie Kenickel Nunes, Fabiane Affonso Pinheiro, Carlos Izaias Sartorão Filho, Guilherme Thomaz de Aquino Nava, Sauro Emerick Salomoni, Cristiane Rodrigues Pedroni, Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge, Angélica Mércia Pascon Barbosa, Diamater Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline Baldini PrudencioSão Paulo State University (Unesp), Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, Botucatu, Brazil.
Sthefanie Kenickel NunesSão Paulo State University (Unesp), Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, Botucatu, Brazil.
Fabiane Affonso PinheiroSão Paulo State University (Unesp), Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, Botucatu, Brazil.
Carlos Izaias Sartorão FilhoSão Paulo State University (Unesp), Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, Botucatu, Brazil.
Guilherme Thomaz de Aquino NavaHuman Development and Technologies, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, Brazil.
Sauro Emerick SalomoniIndependent Researcher, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Cristiane Rodrigues PedroniSão Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Philosophy and Sciences, Marilia, Brazil.
Marilza Vieira Cunha RudgeSão Paulo State University (Unesp), Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, Botucatu, Brazil.
Angélica Mércia Pascon BarbosaSão Paulo State University (Unesp), Postgraduate Program on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, Botucatu, Brazil.
Diamater Study Group
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRTasmanian Abalone Council (Australia) · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a comorbidity which may cause acute and lifelong disorders to mother and child. Alterations in muscular and connective tissues have been associated with GDM in translation studies, characterizing gestational diabetic myopathy. Pregnancy-specific urinary incontinence and sexual disabilities, disorders that depend on the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) integrity, are also associated with GDM both during and after pregnancy. The aim was to compare PFM activation patterns between GDM and non-GDM women from 24-30 gestational weeks to 18-24 months postpartum during a standard clinical test during gestation and postpartum. Methods: We conducted a prospective three-time-point cohort study from gestation (24-30 weeks-T1, and 36-38 weeks-T2) to 18-24 months postpartum (T3). PFM electromyography was recorded in primigravida or primiparous women with one previous elective c-section with or without the diagnosis of GDM according to the American Diabetes Association criteria. A careful explanation of the muscle anatomy and functionality of the PFM was given to participants before EMG assessment. The outcome measures were PFM activation patterns assessed during pregnancy and postpartum, comparing intra and between groups. PFM activation patterns were assessed by normalized electromyography signal at rest and during 1-second (sec) phasic, 10-sec hold, and 60-sec sustained contractions. Results: Demographic and obstetric data showed homogeneity between groups. The GDM group achieved peak PFM EMG amplitudes similarly to the non-GDM group, but they took longer to return to baseline levels during the ~1-sec contraction (flicks). During 10-sec hold contractions, the GDM group sustained lower levels of PFM activation than the non-GDM group at both 36-38 weeks of gestation and 18-24 months postpartum when compared to the non-GDM group. Conclusion: The results suggest that GDM impaired PFM control mainly on 1-sec flicks and 10-sec hold contraction, which appears to develop during late pregnancy and extends long-term postpartum. This motor behavior may play a role on pelvic floor dysfunctions.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalMuscular DiseasesCohort StudiesElectromyographyFemaleHumansMuscle ContractionPelvic FloorPostpartum PeriodPregnancyProspective Studieselectromyographygestational diabetespelvic floorpostpartumpregnant

Identifiers

PMID36277705
PMCPMC9582526
OpenAlexW4303411637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.