Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277586›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Role of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Increasing Femoral Venous Blood Flow After Total Hip Prosthesis.

Murat Calbiyik, Seyhan Yılmaz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Preventing Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Murat CalbiyikOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Hitit University Faculty of Medicine, Corum, TUR.
Seyhan YılmazCardiovascular Surgery, Amasya University Faculty of Medicine, Amasya, TUR.
Amasya Üniversitesi · TRHitit Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the role of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in increasing femoral venous blood flow after total hip prosthesis and to evaluate its potential effects on preventing postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 64 patients who underwent total hip prosthesis were randomly separated into two groups. The NMES group (n=32) received low-molecular-weight heparin+NMES. And the non-NMES group (n=32) received a low-molecular-weight heparin+compression bandage.

resultsThere was no difference between the groups in terms of the presence of preoperative and postoperative leg edema. The calf diameter was significantly lower in the NMES group than in the non-NMES group in both the preoperative (p=0.003) and postoperative (p=0.008) period. Although the femoral vein peak velocity (VPV) was similar between the groups in the preoperative period, it was significantly higher in the NMES group than in the non-NMES group postoperatively (p=0.001). The femoral VPV after total hip prosthesis increased more in the NMES group (43.2%) compared with the non-NMES group (16.3%). In the non-NMES group, the D-dimer value in the preoperative period was lower than on postoperative days one and five (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the D-dimer values on postoperative days one and five. In the NMES group, a statistically significant difference was determined between the preoperative and postoperative test results (F(2.93)=20.86, p=0.001). The preoperative D-dimer values were compared to the postoperative values on the first and fifth day, and according to the post hoc test results, the D-dimer values were significantly lower on the fifth postoperative day than on the first postoperative day, and the preoperative value was significantly lower than the fifth postoperative day value (p<0.05).  Conclusion: Although the two groups were similar in terms of leg edema, there was a significant increase in femoral VPV in the NMES group. This could indicate a potential effect of NMES in preventing postoperative DVT and needs to be confirmed with further studies.

Indexed as

electrical stimulationfemoral veinhip prosthesisnmes devicevenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID36277586
PMCPMC9578661
OpenAlexW4296187206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.