ArticleCureus2022
The Association of Hematological and Biochemical Parameters With Mortality Among COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study From North India.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation of the cycle threshold value of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR with biomarker levels in the prognosis of patients hospitalized with COVID-19.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Approaching Personalized Medicine: The Use of Machine Learning to Determine Predictors of Mortality in a Population with SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Searching for New Biomarkers to Assess COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Study.Metabolites · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background There have been reports published in the Indian setting that describe demographics, clinical characteristics, hospital course, morbidity, and death in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients; however, they are based on small numbers of cases. The current analysis of patients with known outcomes allowed us to gain a better understanding of the disease process and progression in COVID-19 patients, as well as correlate the factors that influence the outcome. Methods This was a record-based, retrospective observational study of patients admitted to a COVID-19 hospital (All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Raipur, India). Between June 1 and August 31, 2021, we gathered medical records of all hospitalized patients having a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis and a known outcome (discharged or died). The extracted data included basic demographics, signs and symptoms, duration of hospitalization, laboratory parameters, and outcomes. Categorical variables were analyzed using either the chi‑square test or Fisher's exact test. The level of significance was set at p<0.05. Results The mean age of the patients was 53.77±15.85 years. Of the patients, 84.2% have moderate to severe disease, and 15.8% of the patients have mild disease. Furthermore, 26.3% of the subjects were deceased, while 73.7% were discharged. The laboratory parameters that were significantly (p<0.05) raised among the dead compared to discharged patients included serum total bilirubin (mg/dL), serum direct bilirubin (mg/dL), serum indirect bilirubin (mg/dL), serum urea (mg/dL), serum uric acid (mg/dL), hematocrit (%), total leukocyte counts (/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.