Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36277574›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

The Treatment of COVID-19 With Monoclonal Antibody Therapy: Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Daniella Lamour, Nika Vafadari, Lisa M Clayton, Joshua J Solano, Patrick G Hughes, Richard D Shih, Scott M Alter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniella LamourDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Nika VafadariDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Lisa M ClaytonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Joshua J SolanoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Patrick G HughesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Richard D ShihDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Scott M AlterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective There have been many efforts to research and produce treatment modalities for COVID-19. Monoclonal antibodies have been one of the effective treatments since their approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under emergency use authorization (EUA) in 2020. This study surveyed COVID-19 patients about their disease course and experience with monoclonal antibody treatment. Methods Patients who received monoclonal antibody treatment between February 12, 2021, and June 2, 2021, at a South Florida community hospital were enrolled in the study. This included patients over 18 years of age with a confirmed positive COVID-19 test result, with mild to moderate symptoms within 10 days of onset and identified as high risk for progression to severe disease. There were no exclusion criteria. After 30 days, patients were followed up via a structured telephone survey regarding subsequent emergency department (ED) visits for worsening COVID-19 symptoms, need for oxygenation, intubation, and death. Secondary outcomes were adverse effects and patient perceptions. Results Among the 119 patients who received monoclonal antibodies during the established time frame, 93 (78.1%) consented to participate in the telephone survey. Of these, 11.8% had a subsequent visit to the ED for worsening COVID-19 symptoms, 6.5% required oxygen, and 2.2% were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). There were no reported intubations or deaths. The vast majority (91.4%) would recommend monoclonal antibody treatment to others. Conclusion Patients who received monoclonal antibody therapy had low rates of subsequent ED visits and rarely required oxygen or ICU admission. The majority of patients would recommend treatment with monoclonal antibodies to others.

Indexed as

covid-19covid-19 treatmentemergency medicinemonoclonal antibodiespublic health

Identifiers

PMID36277574
PMCPMC9580605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.